Calculating Equivalent Voltage in a Complex Circuit: Thevenin vs. Norton

  • Thread starter Thread starter jisbon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating equivalent voltage in complex circuits using Thevenin and Norton transformations. Participants clarify that the equivalent resistance is calculated as (30//20)//40, resulting in 9.23 ohms. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying points for equivalent resistance and suggests that transforming voltage sources may simplify the analysis. Additionally, it is recommended to convert Thevenin sections to Norton sections for easier calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Thevenin and Norton theorems
  • Ability to perform parallel and series resistance calculations
  • Familiarity with circuit analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of source transformations in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Thevenin and Norton transformations in detail
  • Learn how to identify equivalent resistance between specific points in a circuit
  • Explore source transformation techniques for simplifying circuit analysis
  • Practice converting Thevenin circuits to Norton equivalents and vice versa
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and professionals involved in circuit analysis and design will benefit from this discussion.

jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Use source transformation to reduce the circuit to a single voltage source Vs in series with a single resistor R. What are the values of Vs and R?
Relevant Equations
-
1597632087664.png

From this, I can transform the current source to:
1597632154939.png


I can then find the equivalent resistance to be (30//20)//40 = 9.23 ohms.
However, I am not sure how to find the equivalent voltage in this case?
What should I do to start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a wrong transformation. Read this https://people.clarkson.edu/~jsvoboda/eta/dcWorkout/sourceXfrm.pdf a bunch of examples.
 
archaic said:
That's a wrong transformation. Read this https://people.clarkson.edu/~jsvoboda/eta/dcWorkout/sourceXfrm.pdf a bunch of examples.
I don't seem to get it, isn't the transformation correct for the left side though?
 
jisbon said:
I don't seem to get it, isn't the transformation correct for the left side though?
1505994858.png

You have an extra wire that is making a short circuit.
And, by the way, wouldn't you think that transforming the voltage sources instead would be a better strategy?
 
archaic said:
View attachment 267867
You have an extra wire that is making a short circuit.
And, by the way, wouldn't you think that transforming the voltage sources instead would be a better strategy?
Ah ok I get what you mean, so something like:

1597653428920.png

How do I exactly find the 'total' voltage in this case tho?
 
jisbon said:
Ah ok I get what you mean, so something like:

View attachment 267868
How do I exactly find the 'total' voltage in this case tho?
You use the source transform to make the problem easier. non-ideal voltage sources in parallel are hard. Maybe you could transform the sources into something else?
 
jisbon said:
Ah ok I get what you mean, so something like:

View attachment 267868
How do I exactly find the 'total' voltage in this case tho?
That is correct, but follow my advice, don't do that transformation.
 
jisbon said:
I can then find the equivalent resistance to be (30//20)//40 = 9.23 ohms.
How do you know between which two points the equivalent resistance is asked? Ditto for "single voltage Vs".

I am not sure if I understood this problem correctly.
 
cnh1995 said:
How do you know between which two points the equivalent resistance is asked? Ditto for "single voltage Vs".

I am not sure if I understood this problem correctly.
The drawing does not make it explicit, but the fact that all of the top endpoints of the devices in the middle merge onto a single wire and that all of the bottom endpoints of the devices in the middle merge onto a single wire strongly suggests that those two wires are the two points between which equivalent resistance is desired.

[I had the same reaction at first]
 
  • #10
You would be better served to change the two thevenin sections to norton sections so the whole thing is a bunch of Nortons in parallel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K