What Is the Value of the Line Integral Over a Curve on a Level Surface?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the line integral of a gradient field over a curve that lies on a level surface. The context centers around the properties of gradient fields and level surfaces in multivariable calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the curve being on a level surface and the relationship between the gradient field and the level surface. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the level surface and its connection to the gradient.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the integral being zero due to the properties of conservative fields, but there is no consensus on the interpretation of the level surface.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion about the definitions and relationships between the gradient field, the level surface, and the curve. Participants are questioning assumptions about the nature of the surface and the implications for the integral.

Damascus Road
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
I'm having trouble deciding what to do, and in what order for this question:

Suppose F = F( x, y, z ) is a gradient field with F = [tex]\nabla[/tex]f, S is a level surface of f, and C is a curve on S. What is the value of the line integral (over C) of F.dr ?

I think I'm a little confused since there are no values to work with... I'm assuming the level surface of f is referring to [tex]\nabla[/tex]f, meaning that S is a surface of the gradients?

Any help would be appreciated, I'm mighty confused. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They mean that C is contained in a level surface of f. I.e. f(c) is constant for c in C. Dotting grad(f) with a direction vector tells you how fast f is changing in that direction, doesn't it?
 
Ok, someone just explained to me that it is 0, since it's a conservative force.

I was having trouble interpreting S being a level surface of a gradient field, I'm still trying to figure that part out.
 
S is NOT a level surface of the gradient, it's a level surface of f. That's what the question SAID. And there's an even easier reason to say that it's zero (and it's zero even if C isn't closed). What the dot of the gradient vector and the tangent vector to C?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K