MHB What is the velocity of the jet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jet Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a jet given that a propeller plane travels the same distance at one-third the speed of the jet and takes 10 hours longer for the trip. The formula for the jet's velocity is established as v_jet = 3000/t_jet, while the propeller plane's time is expressed as t_prop = t_jet + 10. By equating the travel times, the relationship leads to the equation 3000/v_jet = 9000/v_jet - 10. Solving this equation reveals that the jet's velocity can be determined numerically. Ultimately, the problem emphasizes the importance of using both planes' speed and time relationships to find the jet's velocity.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
A propeller plane and a jet travel 3000miles. The velocity of the plane is 1/3 the velocity of the jet. It takes the prop plane 10 hours longer to complete the trip. What is the velocity of the jet.

Let \(\mathbf{v} = \frac{dx}{dt}\) and \(dx = 3000\). The \(dt = t - t_0\). We can always let \(t_0 = 0\) so \(\mathbf{v}_{\text{jet}} = \frac{3000}{t_{\text{jet}}}\). It appears that the information about the prop plane is unnecessary or can I use that information to determine \(t_{\text{jet}}\)?

We know that \(\mathbf{v}_{\text{prop}} = \frac{1}{3}\mathbf{v}_{\text{jet}}\) and the time require is \(t_{\text{prop}} = t_{\text{jet}} + 10\).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Letting the velocity of the jet be $v$ and observing that both planes travel the same distance $d$, we may write:

$$d=vt=\frac{v}{3}(t+10)$$

For $0<d$, we must have $0<v$, and so we may divide through by $v$ to obtain:

$$t=\frac{t+10}{3}\implies t=5$$

Hence:

$$v=\frac{d}{5}$$
 
dwsmith said:
A propeller plane and a jet travel 3000miles. The velocity of the plane is 1/3 the velocity of the jet. It takes the prop plane 10 hours longer to complete the trip. What is the velocity of the jet.

Let \(\mathbf{v} = \frac{dx}{dt}\) and \(dx = 3000\). The \(dt = t - t_0\). We can always let \(t_0 = 0\) so \(\mathbf{v}_{\text{jet}} = \frac{3000}{t_{\text{jet}}}\). It appears that the information about the prop plane is unnecessary or can I use that information to determine \(t_{\text{jet}}\)?
"v_{\text{jet}}= \frac{3000}{t_{text}} is a formula for the speed of the jet. This problem is asking for a specific numerical answer.

We know that \(\mathbf{v}_{\text{prop}} = \frac{1}{3}\mathbf{v}_{\text{jet}}\) and the time require is \(t_{\text{prop}} = t_{\text{jet}} + 10\).
I would write, rather, that the time is \frac{3000}{v_{\text{jet}}}. The time required for the prop plane to fly 3000 mi would be \frac{3000}{v_{\text{prop}}}= \frac{3000}{\frac{1}{3}v_{\text{jet}}}= \frac{9000}{v_{\text{jet}}} and that is 10 hours more than the time required for the jet:
\frac{3000}{v_{\text{jet}}}= \frac{9000}{v_{\text{jet}}}- 10.

Solve that equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top