What is the wave function for the whole system/atom ?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the wave function of atoms, particularly focusing on single and multi-electron systems. For a hydrogen-like atom with one electron, the wave function is simplified to describe the electron's position. In multi-electron atoms, entanglement complicates the situation, leading to a single wave function that represents the entire system rather than separate wave functions for each electron. The wave function is a solution to Schrödinger's equation, and its form indicates whether particles are entangled. The relationship between the wave function and atomic orbitals in hydrogen is also questioned, suggesting a need for further study in quantum mechanics.
Quandemonitum
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
For example, let's say that psi(q) is the wave function of an electron(which describes/represents the electron) that is located in an atom and isolated/unentangled from the rest of the system. What is the wave function value of this psi(q) ? What is the wave function for that whole atom(with only one electron=hydrogen-like atom) ? What is the wave function for the whole atom[with more than one electron=multi-electron atom(other isolated electrons are represented by other wave functions such as psi(w), psi(t), psi(j), psi(v) etc.)](entanglement is not created!) What is the wave function for the whole atom[with more than one electron=multi-electron atom(other isolated electrons are represented by other wave functions such as psi(w), psi(t), psi(j), psi(v) etc.)](entanglement is created spontaneously so we can not talk about the listed wave functions above we have only one wave function that describes the quantum system/atom!=entanglement is created!)

(Attention1: Due to the entanglement principle, since there is an entanglement in multi-electron systems we can not talk about the separate wave functions that describe/represents other electrons, there is only one wave function that describes the whole system.)
(Attention2: Mathematical and physical proofs are required!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Attention2: Mathematical and physical proofs are required!)
If you want mathematical and physical proofs, you'll have to spend a few months with a decent introductory QM text - a thread in an online forum is no substitute. You'll find some recommendations for good textbooks elsewhere on this forum.

However, from some of your other questions, I suspect that you're asking a much more basic question: "What is all this stuff about wave functions and entanglements?". If so...

In general the wave function is ##\psi(u1_x,u1_y,u1_z,u2_x,u2_y,u2_z, u3_x, ...)## where the ##u1## values are the x, y, and z coordinates of the first particle, the ##u2## values are the x, y, and z coordinates of the second particle, and so forth. If we're considering just a single electron moving in one direction, then this simplifies down to the form that you've seen, ##\psi(x)##, because we only have one particle and its position is described by the single number ##x##. For a two-particle system in which both particles are constrained to move along the same straight line, we would write ##\psi(x1,x2)##.

The function ##\psi(...)## is itself a solution to a differential equation called Schrodinger's equation. If ##\psi(...)## takes on a certain form ("non-factorizable" in the lingo) then we say that the particles covered by ##\psi(...)## are "entangled".

Beyond that... as I said, you have to find a decent textbook and get started learning (although the first thing you'll learn is that you have to learn some more math before you can get started).

This thread is closed.
 
Thank you. However i have one more question: what is the wave function for the whole hydrogen-like atom ? What is the association of this wave function with atomic orbitals in hydrogen atom ? Is that wave function for the whole atom equal to the linear combinations of the atomic orbitals in that hydrogen atom ? Are atomic orbitals parts of the wave function for the whole atom ?
 
Google for "Schrodinger equation hydrogen atom"
This thread is closed for real this timre.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K