What Is This Object? (5.5 MB Image Included)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dotancohen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying an object depicted in a 5.5 MB image. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the nature of the object, considering possibilities from meteorites to microscopic entities, while also debating the context and implications of the image.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the object could be a meteorite burning up in the Earth's atmosphere, while others suggest it might be a comet.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of it being Mercury.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the object's nature, with suggestions ranging from a microscopic entity to a BB on a dusty surface.
  • There are claims that the object appears to be illuminated by an external light source, not its own radiation.
  • One participant notes that the background may resemble a surface or liquid, with specific markings that could indicate damage or dirt on film.
  • Another participant argues that the object does not appear to be of astronomical origin, suggesting it could be a lit match or a cigarette.
  • Some participants emphasize the need for context to accurately assess the image, while others express skepticism about the reliability of the provided context.
  • There are humorous interjections about the object being a space station, which are met with skepticism and corrections.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the identity of the object, with multiple competing views and ongoing uncertainty about its nature and context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the discussion due to the lack of context provided by the original poster, which affects the ability to accurately identify the object. There are also mentions of potential issues with the image quality and interpretation of visual elements.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals curious about object identification, image analysis, and the interpretation of visual data in scientific contexts.

  • #31
> Well, come on, let's be frank... You did post it in
> the astronomy forum. But, good luck trying to
> figure this out.

No I didn't, it was probably moved here. Actually, I did not even realize that it was moved until you mentioned it. In my opinion, it shouldn't be here because the object might not be an astronomical object. I am rather surprised that a mod would make such an assumption and thus move the thread.

Can a mod please move this back to the General forum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
KrisOhn said:
It's a space station!

I'm sorry, I had to.

"That's a fully operational battle station!"

Come on man!
 
  • #34
dotancohen said:
> Well, come on, let's be frank... You did post it in
> the astronomy forum. But, good luck trying to
> figure this out.

No I didn't, it was probably moved here. Actually, I did not even realize that it was moved until you mentioned it. In my opinion, it shouldn't be here because the object might not be an astronomical object. I am rather surprised that a mod would make such an assumption and thus move the thread.

Can a mod please move this back to the General forum?
Sorry, the thread was mistakenly moved, and then that threw everyone off...moving back to GD.
 
  • #35
Here is is, cropped to maintain full resolution. I also tried a histogram stretch to bring out dim details and there is nothing else there. The photo is greyscale - there is no color in it, but that doesn't mean the object photographed is black and white. What people assumed to be stars in the background appear to just be ccd read noise from a long exposure.

One possibility I see: a lit cigarette.
 

Attachments

  • what-is-this.jpg
    what-is-this.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 446
  • #36
It looks like a matchstick to me.
 
  • #38
dotancohen, did you retrieve this as an image from a website? If so, the original file name might help.
 
  • #39
It looks to me like a cotton ball on a black and dusty surface photographed with a flash fired from the right side (causing the 'black trail').
 
  • #40
No, I got the photo from the original photographer. I think but am not sure that it was shot in raw and converted to tif. If that's important I can ask.
 
  • #41
I know, it is some kind of science or abnormal psychology experiment, right ? And we are your experimental audience.

I will sit back then with my popcorn and watch, good luck, everyone...

Rhody... :devil:
 
Last edited:
  • #42
Pretty much, rhody!

It is some sciencey thing, and when I couldn't figure out what it is I said that I know a community who _could_ figure it out. I have faith that someone here might be familiar with this or something like it.
 
  • #43
russ_watters said:
Here is is, cropped to maintain full resolution. I also tried a histogram stretch to bring out dim details and there is nothing else there. The photo is greyscale - there is no color in it, but that doesn't mean the object photographed is black and white. What people assumed to be stars in the background appear to just be ccd read noise from a long exposure.

One possibility I see: a lit cigarette.

Lit cigarettes aren't usually rounded on the end. Depending on how fast the person is smoking the cigarette, they often burn to a point on the lit end.

It's hard to tell whether or not the object is under magnification. Its imperfections seem to be exaggerated (which may indicate magnification). It could be a piece of felt on the end of something. Felt has a similar texture to the object in the picture.

Is it a swab of some sort? It almost looks like a type of q-tip.
 
  • #44
my guess is some kind of microscopy of a probe tip. the probe is elevated slightly at the tip wrt to the base, and the illumination is from the right.
 
  • #45
post any reference!
 
  • #46
It is some drop in a PIV experiment. The supposed "stars" are glass tracer particles.
 
  • #47
MotoH said:
"That's a fully operational battle station!"

Come on man!

MotoH said:
The person I quoted misquoted star wars, and I was correcting him. which is one of the 7 deadly sins.

Man! What Star Wars did you watch?! The proper quote is the one I said, 'That's no moon, it's a space station.' - Said by Obi Wan

Time and movie:
Star Wars Episode IV (A New Hope) - 1:01:49
 
  • #48
russ_watters said:
Here is is, cropped to maintain full resolution. I also tried a histogram stretch to bring out dim details and there is nothing else there. The photo is greyscale - there is no color in it, but that doesn't mean the object photographed is black and white. What people assumed to be stars in the background appear to just be ccd read noise from a long exposure.

One possibility I see: a lit cigarette.

Yeah I see that as a possibility.

It can't be a match, because a match has a bulb at the end of it. This is cylindrical the whole way up, then the top is rounded. A cigarette is the closet thing I can think of that looks like that. The ratios look right. The only problem I have is what someone else mentioned, that a cigarette doesn't usually burn that evenly, and will usually have flakes, so I don't think it would look that smooth. Not to mention you'd have the smoke trail coming off of it.

It definitely has it's own light source, and it's a smooth cylinder all the way to the top with a rounded tip... Maybe a light diode? Like those things you can get at a carnival with all of the acrylic pieces coming out of it... Kind of like a fiber optic wire with lights inside of it. Can't remember what they're called... Looks like one of those in black and white and photographed up close, with the contrast and brightness exaggerated in the pic (which you can do on the camera itself. So even if it's the original pic, they can still edit that stuff in the camera itself before the picture is even taken).
 
  • #49
Hmmm, a possibility that just came into my head is a chalked pool cue tip, with chalk dust around it.
 

Similar threads

Why can I neglect angular momentum due to precession here?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Undergrad Relativistic Space Travel: Optimizing Proper Time [Project Hail Mary]
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Reducing one algebraic fraction to another
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Mirror placed horizontally between two half convex lenses
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Shrinking file size for picture (.jpeg)
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Graduate Magnifying diffraction patterns and real images
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Undergrad Do particles leave behind an image when crossing cosmo event horizon?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Graduate A Universal picture of hadron interactions?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Undergrad Image appears outside of q -- Lens Maker's Equation confusion
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
LaTeX Placing greyscale .jpg images into a matrix
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K