What is this question referring to?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Needhelp2013
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concept of total differentiation in multivariable calculus, specifically in the context of the function u = ln(sin(xy)). The participant identifies the differentiation of u with respect to x and y, leading to the equation du = cot(xy)(ydx + xdy). The discussion emphasizes the distinction between total differentiation and implicit differentiation, clarifying that while the notation resembles fractions, it does not imply numerical multiplication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with differentiation techniques
  • Knowledge of implicit differentiation
  • Basic grasp of logarithmic and trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of total differentiation in multivariable functions
  • Explore implicit differentiation techniques in calculus
  • Learn about the applications of the chain rule in multivariable contexts
  • Investigate the properties of logarithmic and trigonometric derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching multivariable calculus, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of differentiation techniques in mathematical analysis.

Needhelp2013
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is this question en example of:
Given u=lnsin(xy) show that


Homework Equations


du=cot(xy)(ydx + xdy)


The Attempt at a Solution


I think it is total differentiation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd call it implicit differentiation: ie.
if ##u=xy##, then differentiating everything wrt x tells me $$\frac{du}{dx}=y+x\frac{dy}{dx} \Rightarrow du = ydx+xdy$$
 
This is a convenient shortcut, but remember that [itex]\frac{du}{dx}[/itex] is not really a fraction, although it looks like one.

Officially the definition is
[tex]du = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \, dx + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \, dy[/tex]
for u = u(x, y).
That result du = y dx + x dy in Simon's example comes out correctly by "multiplying through by dx" is not completely co-incidental, but you should realize there's no real multiplication involved as "dx" is not really a number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K