What is torque required at wheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter vasim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Wheel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required to rotate a vehicle wheel at a specified speed and load within a test rig. Participants explore the relationship between torque, force, acceleration, and the moment of inertia of various components involved in the setup.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the torque needed for a wheel with a diameter of 1.2 m and a load of 8000 kg to rotate at 354 rpm.
  • Another participant states that to maintain a constant speed, the net torque is zero, suggesting a rephrasing of the question to focus on acceleration rather than speed.
  • A participant calculates the required torque based on an assumed acceleration to reach 80 km/h in 2 minutes, yielding a torque of 944 Nm.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the load definition and the implications of the roller's moment of inertia on the calculations.
  • Further calculations are suggested, including the need to consider the moment of inertia of the tire, wheel, axle, and roller when determining the power needed for acceleration.
  • One participant requests assistance in calculating the moment of inertia for a roller with a diameter of 0.3 m.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of measuring the torque needed and the moments of inertia for accurate results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of torque in relation to speed and acceleration. There is no consensus on the calculations presented, and multiple perspectives on the necessary considerations for torque and moment of inertia remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the information provided about the test rig and the load, which may affect the accuracy of calculations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the relationships between torque, force, acceleration, and the moment of inertia.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for engineers and students involved in mechanical design, automotive testing, and those interested in the dynamics of rotating systems.

vasim
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
i want to move a wheel of vehical in new test rig... i just knw tyre dia. 1.2 m .. load for perticular wheel is 8000 kg... required rpm 354 .. (i.e 80 km/h)
then what is torque required for wheel to rotate at 354 rpm..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
To rotate at a constant speed, the net torque is zero.
Does not matter what the speed is.

Torque is a kind of force - it produces accelerations not speeds.
Rework your question in those terms and the answer should occur to you ;)
 
Simon Bridge said:
Welcome to PF;
To rotate at a constant speed, the net torque is zero.
Does not matter what the speed is.

Torque is a kind of force - it produces accelerations not speeds.
Rework your question in those terms and the answer should occur to you ;)

So the real question would be 'in how many seconds or minutes do you want to go from zero to 80 Km/hr.. You can see, for instance, if it had to be in one second, would require an acceleration of about 2+ G's so you could work out the torque required from there.
 
Thanks litup - I was hoping vasim would do something like that ;)

There is actually quite a lot we don't know about the rig in question - like what "8000kg load" means.
But vasim is looking at the test rig and the tire so should be able to see further than us.
 
thanx simon and ltup

i did some sample calculations for test rig as i am development engineer @ arabian axles manufacturing company i want to test my axles in perticular speed (80 km/h means 22.22 m/s )and load ... as my axles load carrying capacity is 16T SO i COnsider the the load @ each spring flap is 8000 kg + body weight 500 kg (only for test rig body weight mean bogie weight equally devided on 4 wheels)

now acceleration i take (assumptions) 80 km/h speed in 2 mins
therefore a= 22.22/120 = 0.1851 m/s/s
F = m X a = 8500 (KG) X 0.1851 (m/s/s)
= 1573 (kg m/s2)
= 1573 N ... (as per Newtons law 1 Kg m/S2 = 1 N)

Now torque = F X r (tyre radius)
= 1573 *0.6 (m)
=944 Nm
i am going to give this torque to rollar which will going to turn on the wheel
so to rotate this rollar at torque 944

P = (2 X Pi xN x T)/60000
= 43 KW
so i has to purchase the motor of 50 kw?
or less as excess 7 kw will be useful to overcome frictional lossess between tyre and roller..

is my calculations correct?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Thanks litup - I was hoping vasim would do something like that ;)

There is actually quite a lot we don't know about the rig in question - like what "8000kg load" means.
But vasim is looking at the test rig and the tire so should be able to see further than us.

litup said:
So the real question would be 'in how many seconds or minutes do you want to go from zero to 80 Km/hr.. You can see, for instance, if it had to be in one second, would require an acceleration of about 2+ G's so you could work out the torque required from there.



i did some sample calculations for test rig as i am development engineer @ arabian axles manufacturing company i want to test my axles in perticular speed (80 km/h means 22.22 m/s )and load ... as my axles load carrying capacity is 16T SO i COnsider the the load @ each spring flap is 8000 kg + body weight 500 kg (only for test rig body weight mean bogie weight equally devided on 4 wheels)

now acceleration i take (assumptions) 80 km/h speed in 2 mins
therefore a= 22.22/120 = 0.1851 m/s/s
F = m X a = 8500 (KG) X 0.1851 (m/s/s)
= 1573 (kg m/s2)
= 1573 N ... (as per Newtons law 1 Kg m/S2 = 1 N)

Now torque = F X r (tyre radius)
= 1573 *0.6 (m)
=944 Nm
i am going to give this torque to rollar which will going to turn on the wheel
so to rotate this rollar at torque 944

P = (2 X Pi xN x T)/60000
= 43 KW
so i has to purchase the motor of 50 kw?
or less as excess 7 kw will be useful to overcome frictional lossess between tyre and roller..

is my calculations correct?
 
vasim said:
i did some sample calculations for test rig as i am development engineer @ arabian axles manufacturing company...
Well done! Where did you get your degree?

i want to test my axles in perticular speed (80 km/h means 22.22 m/s )and load ... as my axles load carrying capacity is 16T SO i COnsider the the load @ each spring flap is 8000 kg + body weight 500 kg (only for test rig body weight mean bogie weight equally devided on 4 wheels)

now acceleration i take (assumptions) 80 km/h speed in 2 mins
therefore a= 22.22/120 = 0.1851 m/s/s
F = m X a = 8500 (KG) X 0.1851 (m/s/s)
= 1573 (kg m/s2)
= 1573 N ... (as per Newtons law 1 Kg m/S2 = 1 N)
That would be the force through the center of mass of the wheel needed to accelerate the center of mass to 80kmph.

Now torque = F X r (tyre radius)
... only if the force is applied at the outside of the tire - is this the case?

= 1573 *0.6 (m)
=944 Nm
i am going to give this torque to rollar which will going to turn on the wheel
so to rotate this rollar at torque 944
Nope.

The roller also has a moment of inertia.

You want the outside of a tire to be moving at a linear speed of 80kmph = 22.22m/s and you want to spin that up in 2mins by applying a constant torque to a roller pressing against the outside of the tire. Since the tire has radius 0.6m, that makes the angular speed about ω=37rad/s.

You can work out the average power from conservation of energy:

$$\bar P = \frac{\Delta E}{\Delta t} = \frac{1}{\Delta t}\left(\frac{1}{2}(I_{tire}+I_{wheel}+I_{axel}+I_{roller})\omega^2 + E_{losses}\right)$$

If you put ##E_{losses}=0## the result is a minimum power needed to get the acceleration you want. In general, this is a bad approximation - losses are seldom insubstantial and you won't get a constant acceleration for a constant applied torque. Even with all that, you still have to work out the moments of inertia, which depend on the exact geometry of the moving parts.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Well done! Where did you get your degree?

That would be the force through the center of mass of the wheel needed to accelerate the center of mass to 80kmph.


... only if the force is applied at the outside of the tire - is this the case?

Nope.

The roller also has a moment of inertia.

You want the outside of a tire to be moving at a linear speed of 80kmph = 22.22m/s and you want to spin that up in 2mins by applying a constant torque to a roller pressing against the outside of the tire. Since the tire has radius 0.6m, that makes the angular speed about ω=37rad/s.

You can work out the average power from conservation of energy:

$$\bar P = \frac{\Delta E}{\Delta t} = \frac{1}{\Delta t}\left(\frac{1}{2}(I_{tire}+I_{wheel}+I_{axel}+I_{roller})\omega^2 + E_{losses}\right)$$

If you put ##E_{losses}=0## the result is a minimum power needed to get the acceleration you want. In general, this is a bad approximation - losses are seldom insubstantial and you won't get a constant acceleration for a constant applied torque. Even with all that, you still have to work out the moments of inertia, which depend on the exact geometry of the moving parts.


THANKS SIMON
can you pls give me sample calulation of MOment of inertia.. as i found difficulties to calculate... my roller dia is o.3 m
 
You can look up "moment of inertia" online to find examples.
You'll probably have to approximate the geometries to get a ballpark figure.
It is still best practice to measure the torque needed... you can also measure the moments of inertia.
An engineering course will usually involve exercises in doing this.

I'm trying to figure out what education level to aim my replies at.
In many jurisdictions the word "engineer" is legally reserved for people with a postgraduate Engineering degree and trade or professional certification. When you identified yourself as an engineer, I just assumed that you had one of these. Is this not the case?
 
  • #10
dear simon thanx

i get my degree @ UNIVERICITY OF PUNE in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING in 2011
 
  • #11
i knw how to calculate moment of inertia.. just i am become some rusty... n my books are in India and i am working in saudi arabia... sill thanks for your help
 
  • #12
Assuming you want to use an ac motor, then run it up to top speed, which coincides with the top speed of the rig, so you need some gearing inbetween ( ac motor = 1470 rpm, rig = 354 rpm )
Example : motor sprocket 20 teeth, rig sprocket 83 teeth

What defines the motor is the time you accept for the rig to reach top speed, faster time = more motor power required.

A good manual on commercial ac motors with torque curves would help you.

I suggest a time step programme on an excel sheet so you can change the input (motor power) data easily.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
i knw how to calculate moment of inertia.. just i am become some rusty... n my books are in India and i am working in saudi arabia... sill thanks for your help
OK, I won't labour the point, we all get rusty: you need a recap:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html
... rotational stuff, scroll to the general form of the moment of inertia calculation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia
... list of common moments of inertia

If you are determined to go the calculation route - you'll need to make some approximations for the mass distribution. You may get away with it if you just want back-of-envelope figures.
But dean barry is correct, you need a manual.

You certainly need a lot more detail than you have got so far.
Good luck.
 
  • #14
You will need to consider the moment of inertia of the motor rotor itself, as well as the rotating parts of the rig.

With a 800 kg load and a Coefficient of rolling resistance of 0.03 your looking at a drag of 800 * 9.8 *0.03 =
235 N at the wheel radius, multiply by the wheel radius for rolling resistance torque.

The more i look at this the more id be tempted to build the rig and start with a small motor (say a washing machine motor) and leave room in the design for bigger motor options.

Id put some hefty gaurds in place as well.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K