What makes a misaligned belt drive inefficient?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hihiip201
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Belt Drive
AI Thread Summary
Misalignment in a belt drive system leads to inefficiencies primarily due to increased friction at the contact points between the belt and pulleys. This friction arises when the belt does not meet the pulley tangentially, causing sliding contact and resulting in vibration, noise, and excessive heating. The need for greater tension to prevent slippage further exacerbates wear on both the belt and pulleys, leading to uneven wear patterns and reduced lifespan. Additionally, the interplay between misalignment and increased friction can create a feedback loop, worsening the system's efficiency. Overall, proper alignment is crucial for optimal performance and longevity of belt drive systems.
hihiip201
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
http://constructionasphalt.tpub.com/TM-5-3895-374-24-1/css/TM-5-3895-374-24-1_666.htm

consider the misalignment illustration in the link above.

What makes a misaligned belt drive inefficient? I imagine it is due to increase friction but where does this friction manifest in the system? (which component and how?)

Most sites simply state this as an fact without the physical explanation, I was hoping I can get one here.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
V belt/pulley power transmission depends upon friction between belt and pulleys. Ideally, both faces of a V belt are in full and equal contact with their corresponding pulley faces, and transmit force equally with belt(s) tightened to the minimum tension required to prevent slippage. When misaligned, 1. forces are coupled unequally and 2. more tension is required to prevent slippage.

Misalignment inefficiencies manifest themselves as vibration, noise, and excessive heating within the v belt, and at pulley/belt interfaces.

On the maintenance side, in a well designed system, belt life is inversely proportional to temperature - the hotter is runs, the quicker it dies. Belt over-tensioning places unnecessary stress on motor and driven equipment bearings, and reduces their life. Misalignment causes excessive and uneven belt wear, and increases pulley wear leading to 'scalloping', less face contact, and an ever increasing need to over-tension the belt.
 
hihiip201 said:
What makes a misaligned belt drive inefficient? I imagine it is due to increase friction but where does this friction manifest in the system? (which component and how?)
I don't know any theory about this, but from simple experience I'd say that misalignment causes contact between the belt and pulley at points where they are not moving in the same direction. If perfectly aligned, the belt ideally meets the pulley at a tangent, when the pulley and tangent are moving in the same direction and speed. Then the belt conforms to the surface of the pulley and again moves at the same velocity round the portion of contact, until it leaves at a tangent.
If misaligned, the sides of the belt meet the pulley when they are moving in different directions. The sliding contact must cause some frictional loss (and wear.)
pulley_friction.png
pulley_friction2.png

The tension in the belt and degree of misalignment would affect the normal force between the sliding surfaces, and therefore the frictional force. Since extra friction increases the belt tension, there might be some positive feedback here making friction grow disproportionately with degree of misalignment.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic and hihiip201
Friction and the work it takes to bend the belt. I imagine it is somewhat similar to the scrub force of a tire at each end.
 
Merlin3189 said:
I don't know any theory about this, but from simple experience I'd say that misalignment causes contact between the belt and pulley at points where they are not moving in the same direction. If perfectly aligned, the belt ideally meets the pulley at a tangent, when the pulley and tangent are moving in the same direction and speed. Then the belt conforms to the surface of the pulley and again moves at the same velocity round the portion of contact, until it leaves at a tangent.
If misaligned, the sides of the belt meet the pulley when they are moving in different directions. The sliding contact must cause some frictional loss (and wear.)View attachment 210001 View attachment 210002
The tension in the belt and degree of misalignment would affect the normal force between the sliding surfaces, and therefore the frictional force. Since extra friction increases the belt tension, there might be some positive feedback here making friction grow disproportionately with degree of misalignment.

I agree. The picture in my head is similar to the second picture, with a straight belt driven by a crocked pulley, then the teeth of the pulley will move along the surface of the grooves on the belt which is where they meet.thanks!
 
A picture of what I visualize.

looking at the second picture from top view / 3rd picture from rear view of the crocked pulley.

pulley in red, belt in black. the horizontal lines are gears/grooves. and the yellow dot are the contact points, which can also be thought of as one fixed point on a pulley teeth at different time, which we can see slide along the surface of the groove it contacts with.
 

Attachments

  • pully-belt.png
    pully-belt.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 595
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Back
Top