Smurf
- 442
- 3
Yeap, everyone wants to come to Canada.
Smurf said:Yeap, everyone wants to come to Canada.
JasonRox said:and one out of 100 000 knows that Canada used to be similar to the US until a crazy man like Bush was running.
kat said:hmmm, I've been curious about how Canadians view their own Patriot like laws as well as other new "anti-terrorism" laws?
check said:To be honest, I haven't looked into it and I don't think it's been in the news all that much. Must not be a sweeping, radical change. I'll read up on it though when I get a chance and post my thoughts.
Well...maybe if you weren't so blinded by your phsycotic anti-bushism fanatacism you might recognize how important it would be to view how terrorism (or the fear of) has eroded civil rights even in liberal freedom loving Canada (haha). I believe...don't quote me, but check for yourself..the there was a patriot like bill pushed through with little to no debate. Actually I've heard the term "rammed" through in reference to the "anti-terrorrism bill" C-? and I think B-47..d-47, something like that. My understanding at the time was that it dropped the need for pressing charges before arresting and holding someone who was suspected of having an association with terror. I don't believe it required actively being a terrorist..but also included direct and indirect aid. Also, I remember a buzz about judges being able to coerce testimony from the accused against theirselves amongst other things.Ivan Seeking said:It seems to me that Canadians are more worried about Bush than Al-Qaida.![]()
check said:To be honest, I haven't looked into it and I don't think it's been in the news all that much. Must not be a sweeping, radical change. I'll read up on it though when I get a chance and post my thoughts.
http://www.911review.org/Wget/scienceforpeace.sa.utoronto.ca/Special_Activities/Galati_Page.htmlCanada's Anti-Terrorism Act to be reviewed said:The two most controversial measures in the act are so-called preventive arrests and investigative hearings. The arrest power allows police to detain a suspect without a warrant if they deem it necessary to stop a terrorist action. The power to compel individuals to testify at secret hearings is designed to make sure authorities can collect vital information on terrorist activities. While government is required to report annually on how these two extraordinary tools are used, it has done so only once since the law was passed, reporting that neither power was exercised in 2002. No report for 2003 has yet been released, prompting criticism from civil liberties advocates. But federal officials said the report for 2003 is being "fine-tuned" and should be made public soon. So far, only one use of the investigative-hearing power has come to light, in a Supreme Court challenge brought by a reluctant witness who was being forced to testify about the 1985 Air India bombing (the court ruled last June that the provision does not violate the Constitution).
Well...does it always have to be a comparision, can't you give YOUR opinion of YOUR anti-terrorism laws?Smurf said:Regarding the Canada vs USA argument that always seems to come up; I think that anyone who arrives at the conclusion that Canada's crimes are worse than USA's needs to re-examine their own history in a more "Liberal" fashion.
Kat express my contempt for my own government so many times. However I do believe that Canada is much more liberal than the USA, if I ever see an effective argument disproving that assertation I will only welcome it, but I havn't heard anything to even put Canada on par with the crimes of the US.kat said:Well...does it always have to be a comparision, can't you give YOUR opinion of YOUR anti-terrorism laws?
tumor said:HOW PEOPLE HERE CAN BE SO DUMB?
ek said:I suppose english is your second language, but that sentence is very ironic.
Ivan Seeking said:It seems to me that Canadians are more worried about Bush than Al-Qaida.![]()

xck said:I thought the Canadian governement severed ties with England (with their blessing of course) and gained their independence (governmentally at least) back in the 60's or 70's, I think the 70's. I am unable to access my brain file on that this second.
Gonzolo said:iansmith, I am not sure I understand your signature, (in relation with your avatar?). Do you have that radio channel in Halifax?
lucifer said:hmm.. I'm a HS senior and considering going to school in Canada. this is interesting. since there are so many people from Canada that are reading this thread I'm just going to throw this out there: would it be that hard for me be able to get into Canada if i just want to study? and what are some of the good schools(i've heard about some like U of Toronto, McGill but can't really find too much info about how good they are... ).
lucifer said:hmm.. I'm a HS senior and considering going to school in Canada. this is interesting. since there are so many people from Canada that are reading this thread I'm just going to throw this out there: would it be that hard for me be able to get into Canada if i just want to study? and what are some of the good schools(i've heard about some like U of Toronto, McGill but can't really find too much info about how good they are... ).
and yes i don't like the direction we are going in right now but I'm for the most part, politically apathetic, so that's not my main reason...
xck said:Smurf
I have no "beef" with the queen. I simply don't understand why she is Canada's icon in abstentia, right? She resides in England, no?
I thought the Canadian governement severed ties with England (with their blessing of course) and gained their independence (governmentally at least) back in the 60's or 70's, I think the 70's. I am unable to access my brain file on that this second.
In 1982 Prime Minister Trudeau and Finance Minister Chretien along with the Queen signed into effect the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, effectively severing ties with England.
I am unable to think of the word, the group of countries that Britain had it's grip on like Australia and the others (i never took history and have flunked every IQ test for a good reason), and if I remember correctly it was as if Britain said, "Okay you are set free from us, but our finger you will always pheel" It reminded me of those who leave street gangs, they still walk with the tattoo, but are disconnected from the gang. I remember when I did some digging a few years ago on Canada I was mighty surprised.
The word is Commonwealth. And I don't quite get the gang comparison.
The Queen reminds me of a ghost. Gone, but lingering. Hovering still over Canada.
I love Canada. Maybe one day I will live there (dreams are real). I have a plate that came to be (in an odd way) from Canada. It says Victoria, BC, Canada and is a lovely blue plate which matches my Blue Willow set. I'm preparing to just jump on an Amtrak in February, and head north. I'm in California so it would be a nice train ride North. I hear I would have to take a pherry from Seattle to BC. I guess I 'll have to wait and sea.
I live in Victoria, the place where your plate is from. And yes, if you wanted to come to the city you would have to take a ferry from either Seattle or Vancouver. Vancouver and the rest of BC, however, can be accessed from land.
Many things Canadian have found their way to me. Where I live now, there are some Canadians that are in and around. I :!) it.
My brother is marrying a Canadian gal next September, but I think she is from Ontario or Toronto (doesn't count, altho I will see New Foundland one day). I wonder if Canada would consider a citizenship swap. I'll gladly give her my American-whatever, on the condition that she give me hers. I better hurry and meet her before she sells her house to move to Cali. Maybe unlike most, if I buy, I could have a vacation home in Canada, and Cali and never pay taxes
My desire to go to Canada, possibly live there IF they'll have me has NOTHING to do with President Bush. He's doing his thing, and I"m doing my thing. Like I stated in my other post, since I was 5 while other girls were dreaming of Paris, or wherever, I was dreaming of Canada.
I would have to return to Cali to purchase books. My goodness ... the other day I purchased a book, it was 39.00 and in Canada it was 69.00 or 79.00If a book catches my interest I'll pay whatever to own the book short term to receive the information, but to pay almost double what I am able to buy here for half? Wow. I would like to live close to the Northern border so the trip to the bookstore in WA wouldn't be far. Oh yeah, I guess it would have to be close to the pherry. I never believed in phairies till I was told one would definitely have to get me into Canada.
You can drive into Canada there homeslice. As I said above, a ferry is only required if you want to go to Vancouver Island or the Gulf Islands.
The Canadian dollar is around .80-.85 right now. Those prices would not be nearly as severe anymore. The dollar used to be around .60-.65.
It's cool if Queen is still kickin' when I arrive there. I love green. My love for Canada makes no sense at all, and it doesn't have to. I do love the low-low crime rate. Wow, we Americans could sure learn a lot from yous. I better brush up on my English before my tripI red French and English are your country's *- languages and are taught in schools. Sometimes I wonder why America doesn't follow suit and just get over it and make Spanish/English America's languages. Afterall this used to be Mexico.
French is not really taught that much in our schools. I took eight years of it, but it is only required you do one year I think. And it's not in depth at all, I can't speak french worth a damn, even after eight years. It is an official language though, and it is on all of our cereals, beverage containers, laundry detergents et al. It is not, however, on street signs and stuff like that. The only province that is truly bilingual is New Brunswick, where stop signs say both "Stop" and "Arret".
Thank you for asking your question Smurf. I was able to arrive at a conclusion, without compromise, in me mind that has escaped me till now.
!Wait a minute, you are from BC Please pheel free to correct me on anything that is crooked in my response. If you care to, please email me at Oaracal@aol.com if you are up on custom's laws. I have read some, and all I know is I need to contact some outfit in San Francisco to make sure neither of us (myself and the Mr.) have no border problems.
I was recently married, and we are going to moonhoney in Canada. If he can get across the border it will be wei, and if not then it will be me. Probably just for a few hours if he is unable to pass customs. If you don't "do" email that's cool. Someone will, no problem. If he is unable to get across the border, he'll just have to wait in WA
I just have to say you have some of the worst spelling and grammar I've ever read. Oh well.
) my friend was robed twice, and so on and on.tumor said:I wonder why would anyone come to Canada to live here in this frozen wasteland? Australia,New Zealand would be much better choice, and you have your Quenn still in place.
Except province of Quebec rest of Canada is wild,uncivilized and crude.One thing I like here and my reason for living here is spectacular nature, sadly trees are being cut in most pristine places, oil scraped from thousand of hectares of praries etc, in other words it is going downhill fast.
PS. if you guys decide anyway to come here,learn some karate or kung-fu, because people here are very short tempered and dangerouse and you must be ready to fight those Canadian yahoos!
I have been assaulted verbally and physically here without any provocation and almost beaten recently, since then I carry 10 inch kitchen knife in my backpack all the time! I know it is illegal to carry knife, but I rather be alive!
One more thing; watch for your possessions /valuables, thiefs are everywhere they stole even my old rusted street bike,couple years ago I lost new m.bike(i'm still in shock over loss of that brand new bike) my friend was robed twice, and so on and on.