What Makes Neutron Stars So Unique?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the characteristics and unique properties of neutron stars, including their formation, internal structure, and the physical processes occurring within and around them. Participants explore theoretical aspects, observational phenomena, and related concepts in astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe neutron stars as remnants of heavy stars that undergo implosion when they exceed the Chandrasekhar mass, leading to the formation of neutrons held up by neutron degeneracy pressure.
  • There is a discussion about the surface composition of neutron stars, with some suggesting it consists of atomic nuclei, primarily iron isotopes, while deeper layers may transition to a neutron superfluid or quark matter.
  • Participants express curiosity about the interface between atomic and neutron regions, questioning how atoms transition to neutrons and the potential for neutron decay and proton interactions.
  • Some contributions highlight the extreme conditions within neutron stars, including high mass density and strong gravitational forces, which may lead to significant reactions and interactions.
  • There is mention of neutron stars being X-ray emitters due to high surface temperatures and the retention of the original magnetic field and angular momentum from the progenitor star.
  • One participant references a specific article on the physics of neutron stars, inviting others to review it.
  • Clarifications are made regarding neutron decay processes and the conservation laws involved, with links provided for further reading.
  • Some participants challenge the idea that the light emitted from neutron stars could include the emission spectrum of iron, suggesting that high temperatures would lead to ionization and emissions primarily in the X-ray region.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the internal structure of neutron stars, the nature of their surface emissions, and the processes occurring within them. There is no consensus on several points, particularly regarding the specifics of neutron decay and the implications of high temperatures on emission spectra.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include various assumptions about the internal structure of neutron stars, the nature of neutron decay, and the conditions under which certain processes occur. Some statements rely on specific definitions and interpretations that may not be universally accepted.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astrophysics, particularly in the areas of stellar evolution, neutron star physics, and particle interactions in extreme environments.

  • #31
SpaceTiger said:
As for emission lines, you usually don't get those in stars unless there is a significant extended region of hot gas beyond the star's photosphere. Stars with heavy stellar winds or interacting binaries will sometimes have emission lines, but most of the time, the spectrum is thermal+absorption. Isolated neutron stars that we can see are usually very hot, so the gas is too heavily ionized even for absorption lines (at least in the optical and UV).
I would imagine it's just gamma radiation - there are no atoms in the core of a neutron star. Highly ionized atoms would produce mostly (if not completely) X-rays.

'Neutronium' is an example of degenerate matter. The link has a rather interesting discussion of 'isotopes of neutronium', although there is a comment that the actual form of neutronium is not well understood.

Neutronium is a colloquial and often misused term for an extremely dense phase of matter that occurs under the intense pressure found in the core of neutron stars and is currently not well understood. It is not an accepted term in astrophysics literature for reasons which will be explained below, but is used with some regularity in science fiction . . . .
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
Astronuc said:
I would imagine it's just gamma radiation - there are no atoms in the core of a neutron star.

We don't see the core of the neutron star, we see the surface. On the surface, there are indeed highly ionized atoms and degeneracy is negligible


Highly ionized atoms would produce mostly (if not completely) X-rays.

Not really, the energy of the radiation that comes out depends largely on the temperature. In the case of a neutron star, all but the very youngest have temperatures <106 K, corresponding to a blackbody peak at <100 eV. Some neutron stars do emit a lot in the X-rays, but there are many cases of highly-ionized media (like HII regions) in which the majority of the radiation is in the optical or UV.
 
  • #33
SpaceTiger said:
We don't see the core of the neutron star, we see the surface. On the surface, there are indeed highly ionized atoms and degeneracy is negligible

SpaceTiger said:
Not really, the energy of the radiation that comes out depends largely on the temperature. In the case of a neutron star, all but the very youngest have temperatures <106 K, corresponding to a blackbody peak at <100 eV. Some neutron stars do emit a lot in the X-rays, but there are many cases of highly-ionized media (like HII regions) in which the majority of the radiation is in the optical or UV.
I was thinking that there has to be a lot of Compton scattering of gamma radiation, hence there would be a fair amount of X-rays. It is true that 100 eV would be in ultraviolet. I suppose there is a distribution of temperature depending on distance from the region of degenerate matter.

At what distance/radius is the region of atomic matter from the degenerate matter? Is there an abrupt transition?

I believe Chronos has indicated that a sufficient model of a neutron star does not exist at this time.

Space Tiger said:
Atoms with most or all of their electrons stripped and roaming free.
Dpes this not imply energies (temperatures) > 100 eV?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K