What makes Spin Launch a promising alternative to traditional rocket launches?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of Spin Launch as an alternative method for launching small payloads into orbit, comparing it to traditional rocket launches. Participants explore the technical aspects, potential advantages, and challenges associated with this proposed slingshot method, including energy requirements, g-forces, and comparisons to existing launch systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe Spin Launch as a method that could utilize a large reusable rotor to launch small rockets, potentially offering economies of scale compared to traditional first-stage vehicles.
  • Questions arise regarding the total energy involved and the losses incurred when passing through the atmosphere at high speeds, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the g-forces involved.
  • Some participants reference figures and formulas related to centripetal acceleration and its implications for launching payloads into Low Earth Orbit (LEO), suggesting limitations based on the radius of the centrifuge.
  • There are mixed views on the credibility of critiques from space tech engineer Scott Manley, with some asserting he debunks the idea while others believe he remains hopeful about its potential.
  • Concerns are raised about the payload capacity of Spin Launch, particularly when accounting for additional components like heat shields and rocket motors, with comparisons made to the Pegasus Rocket and its cost issues.
  • Discussion includes the thermal dynamics of re-entry versus launch, with some participants questioning the energy requirements for heat shields in the context of Spin Launch.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the centrifugal launch concept, drawing parallels to hypersonic weapons and questioning the necessity of such systems given existing missile capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and potential of Spin Launch, with no clear consensus reached. Disagreements exist regarding the effectiveness of the proposed method, the validity of critiques, and the implications of various technical challenges.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the assumptions made about energy requirements, g-forces, and the specific conditions under which Spin Launch would operate. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on the technical feasibility and economic viability of the proposed launch method.

  • #31
mfb said:
The acceleration in tangential direction - increasing the speed of the payload - can be done slowly, over something like an hour with an acceleration well below 1g, lowering the peak power.
So what? The centripetal acceleration will make you just as flat. The power will be less as you say.
If you want to talk about the rate of change of the acceleration (known as the "jerk" where I come from) then you you may have a point but I am not convinced it is very salient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
This interview / discussion / 'factory tour' was very interesting. I recommend it to anyone with interest in the spin launch physics, engineering and associated launch economics.

 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 271 ·
10
Replies
271
Views
29K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K