What Mathematical Concepts Underlie String Theory and Poincaré's Conjecture?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical foundations necessary for understanding advanced topics in theoretical physics, particularly in relation to string theory and the Poincaré conjecture. The original poster, a graduate engineering student with a background in calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations, seeks guidance on further mathematical studies to enhance their skills. Key areas identified include differential geometry and algebraic topology, which are crucial for tackling complex proofs in these fields. To prepare for algebraic topology, a solid understanding of proofs, graduate algebra, and topology is recommended. For differential topology, prerequisites include real analysis and multivariate real analysis. Participants share insights on the necessary coursework and foundational knowledge needed to engage with these advanced mathematical concepts.
GreenLRan
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a graduate engineering student, and as an undergrad I had all the typical engineering math courses: Cal I - III, linear algebra, and differential equations. I am curious. What else is out there?

You hear about the top theoretical physicists of the day trying to prove string theory or find "the theory of everything," also recently the problem involving poincare's conjecture that was solved (I'm guessing this was solved with differential equations and some complex geometry?).

What branch(s) of mathematics are involved with these kinds of proofs? This is not my field particularly as I am not a physicist (I do have a minor in physics however), but I very much want to improve my skills as a mathematician.

Can anyone provide any guidance, references, sources, or books that I may look into?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about how physicists do it, but as far as mathematicians, this is what I have gathered about these topics (I am more familiar with the former than the latter, which isn't saying a lot, so I'll just stick to what I am pretty certain the prereqs are):

Perelman used techniques in differential geometry and algebraic topology, from what I gather. Both of these areas are quite advanced even at the introductory level, especially algebraic topology. In order to get to algebraic topology you need to understand proofs, then you need to do some courses in graduate algebra (maybe one algebra course and a group theory course), then some topology, then you probably will have picked up enough set theory etc. on the way and you can take the grad course in algebraic topology.

As for differential topology as far as I am aware you need real analysis and multivariate real analysis, then you can tackle it.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K