Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the method used by COMSOL to interpolate post-processing data, specifically regarding the interpolation of potentials in a volume conductor. Participants explore different interpolation methods based on the finite element model's order and provide insights into the implications of using various element orders.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about the specific interpolation method and its order used by COMSOL for exporting potentials at arbitrary locations.
- Another suggests checking the post-processing and subdomain integration features in COMSOL, although they express uncertainty about the effectiveness of this approach.
- A participant notes that the interpolation method depends on the order of the finite element model, indicating that first-order elements will result in linear interpolation, while elements with mid-side nodes allow for quadratic interpolation.
- One participant advocates for using the highest order elements possible, suggesting quartic elements, but also humorously reflects on the computational strain this may cause.
- A later reply counters the suggestion of using quartic elements, arguing that there is a trade-off between element order and the number of elements, and expresses skepticism about the necessity of quartic elements for most problems.
- Another participant acknowledges the sarcasm in the previous message regarding the computational demands of high-order elements.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the necessity and efficiency of using higher-order elements for interpolation, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain on the best approach to take.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved assumptions regarding the specific conditions under which different interpolation methods may be preferred, as well as the computational limitations associated with higher-order elements.