What occupation would you've chosen if science wasn't an option?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fearless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around alternative career choices participants would consider if they had not pursued science or engineering. The scope includes personal reflections on various occupations, hobbies, and aspirations outside of STEM fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express interest in becoming an electrician, bartender, or working in construction, highlighting the satisfaction of creating tangible results.
  • Others propose careers such as pilot, architect, musician, or teacher, reflecting a desire for creative or impactful roles.
  • A few participants mention aspirations like becoming an astronaut, Chief Justice, or even a fictional "God Emperor of Earth," indicating a mix of serious and humorous career fantasies.
  • Some participants share experiences related to music, discussing the financial and personal fulfillment aspects of performing.
  • There are mentions of potential careers in economics, financial analysis, and web design, showcasing a range of interests beyond traditional science fields.
  • One participant humorously suggests that without science, everyone would be "peasant farmers," while another counters with the idea of being troubadours.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present a variety of competing views on alternative careers, with no consensus on a single preferred occupation. The discussion remains open-ended, reflecting diverse aspirations and humorous takes on potential life paths.

Contextual Notes

Some responses include personal anecdotes and hypothetical scenarios, which may depend on individual circumstances and preferences. The discussion does not resolve the feasibility or desirability of the proposed careers.

  • #31
I would want to be a potter. Pottery is one of my favorite pastimes. But then again, throwing on the wheel involves some very basic understanding of physics. Also, oxidation and reduction firing involves some basic understanding of chemistry.

russ_watters said:
You're all wrong. If science wasn't an option, we'd all be peasant farmers.
This is a very valid point. However, I was a peasant living on a farm as a kid and I can say that farming also involves some science.

I'll take this statement one step further and say that without science, we would all be food.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Cyrus said:
You really DO deserve to die, DANNY.

You know somethin', DANNY ?
 
  • #33
If not science (I guess I'd have to leave out all the alternative professions that also require science, like physician or high school science teacher?), then either a teacher of some other subject, or lawyer, or maybe I'd run for political office (probably just a local office).
 
  • #34
Musician? Or maybe a computer programer.
 
  • #35
As I am not a scientist, I just put down my own occupation. But now I see the meaning is more like which occupation would you pick second. Since there are so many that would have gone into the arts, I'll say the same. I think I have talent as an artist:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25972909"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
neu said:
porn star
:smile:...yup.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K