What Physical Meaning Underlies the Non-Divergence of the Einstein Tensor?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Tensor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the physical meaning behind the non-divergence of the Einstein tensor within the context of general relativity. Participants explore theoretical implications, comparisons with Newtonian gravity, and the relationship between the Einstein tensor and the stress-energy-momentum tensor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the non-divergence of the Einstein tensor, associating divergence with field sources, similar to the electrical field of a proton.
  • One participant notes that the Einstein tensor's non-divergence implies conservation of energy and momentum, as it is proportional to the stress-energy-momentum tensor, which also satisfies the condition div T = 0.
  • Another participant suggests that the non-divergence can be viewed as constraints on the equations of motion in general relativity, linking it to gauge freedom and the Bianchi identities.
  • A comparison with Newton's formulation of gravity is discussed, highlighting that the Einstein tensor includes second-order derivatives of the metric, akin to how Poisson's equation relates to classical gravitational fields.
  • There is a question raised about the chronological development of the stress-energy tensor and the Einstein tensor, implying a potential causal relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the implications of the Einstein tensor's non-divergence, with no consensus on a singular physical meaning or the relationship to Newtonian gravity.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the relationship between the Einstein tensor and the stress-energy tensor remain unexamined, and the discussion does not resolve the complexities of comparing general relativity with Newtonian gravity.

snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
What physical meaning can be ascribed to the non-divergence of the Einstein tensor? I find it counterintuitive since I associate divergence with field sources (like the electrical field of a proton) and obviously a gravitational field has a source. Is there a parallel with Newton's formulation of gravity that might be instructive?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
snoopies622 said:
What physical meaning can be ascribed to the non-divergence of the Einstein tensor? I find it counterintuitive since I associate divergence with field sources (like the electrical field of a proton) and obviously a gravitational field has a source. Is there a parallel with Newton's formulation of gravity that might be instructive?
Since the Einstein tensor is proportional to the stress-energy-momentum tensor, T it means that energy and momentum is conserved since div T = 0. This holds true even when the cosmological constant is non-zero.

Pete
 
snoopies622 said:
What physical meaning can be ascribed to the non-divergence of the Einstein tensor? I find it counterintuitive since I associate divergence with field sources (like the electrical field of a proton) and obviously a gravitational field has a source. Is there a parallel with Newton's formulation of gravity that might be instructive?

You can also see them as constraints on the equations of motion. Intuïtively you can understand them as follows: in general relativity one wants to solve for the metric tensor, which is symmetric and thus can have 10 independent entries ( n*(n+1)/2 ). However, one is free to choose the coordinates, and this gives some freedom in your equations ( which can be seen as a gauge-freedom ). The consequences of this can be calculated to be the Bianchi-identities, which give that the Einstein tensor is divergence-free. Note that this is an identity rather than a symmetry; the description of physics doesn't depend on your coordinates.

A parallel with Newton's formulation is a little tricky; but you have to be aware of the fact that the Einstein tensor already contains second order derivatives of the metric, just like Poisson's equation is a second order differential equation of the classical gravitational field ! A sensible parallel would appear to me that due to constraints on the gravitational field the third order divergence of the classical gravitational field would be zero.
 
So Einstein created the stress-energy tensor first, then made [tex]G_{ab}[/tex] to match it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K