What Should I Know Before Taking General Topology?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on preparing for a General Topology course, with participants sharing insights on the subject and its prerequisites. Topology is described as a branch of mathematics that generalizes concepts like convergence and continuity beyond the confines of real numbers, making it more abstract than previous courses. A solid understanding of proof writing is emphasized as crucial for success in topology. While a background in analysis is beneficial, it is noted that complex variables can serve as a good foundation for topology, as many concepts in complex analysis lead naturally to topological ideas. The complex variables course covers essential topics such as analytic functions, complex integration, and Cauchy's theorem, which are relevant to understanding topology. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of mathematical maturity and the interconnectedness of these advanced topics.
Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
Hey everybody,

I just wanted to ask a general question about Topology. I am planning on taking a General Topology course in Spring 2013 and first of all I don't know what it is. I am finishing up Differential Equations 1 right now with an A. By the spring I will have taken linear algebra 2 and complex variables. I have already finished Calculus 1-3 and linear algebra 1, all with high A's. Unfortunately I have not and probably will not take a geometry class by this spring. The catalog simply says that linear algebra 1 is sufficient but I have my doubts.

What is topology? What do I need to study and know before I take the course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a background in analysis, the motivation for a lot of the concepts will be lost, but you shouldn't find it overly difficult provided you're proficient in proof writing.

Topology generalizes a number of concepts in analysis like convergence and continuity of sequences and functions. You've already encountered these concepts in calculus, but only in the context of the reals, which possesses a number of unnecessarily restrictive qualities (like the notion of "distance", which topology dispenses with).
 
Like Number Nine says, without analysis, some of the stuff might seem odd since it is generalisations of real stuff. However, in my Complex class, we did lots of stuff with open sets and what not, so if you do this as well, you might get most of the motivations.

Topology is a very interesting class. It will be the most abstract class you have taken, and this will make it tough. But it is well worth it. I didn't take it as an undergrad, but I have spent this summer working through a book. You'll have fun if you like abstract math.
 
Would changing my complex variables class this fall for a real analysis class better prepare me for topology?
 
Hercuflea said:
Would changing my complex variables class this fall for a real analysis class better prepare me for topology?

Complex variables can actually be a very good precursor to topology. Many things in complex variables lead naturally to concepts in topology.

Can you tell us what the complex variables class covers?? What book does it use?
 
FUND.OF COMPLEX ANAL.F/MATH,SCI.+ENGR.
Author SAFF
Edition 3RD 03
ISBN 9780139078743

MATH 4391 - Complex Variables
3 Class Hours 0 Laboratory Hours 3 Credit Hours
Prerequisite: A grade of “C” or better in MATH 2203 (Calculus 3).

The study of complex variables is a central subject in mathematics, important for students in mathematics, engineering and physical sciences (due to so many applications to fluid mechanics, heat conduction, and electromagnetic theory). Complex variables are a very powerful tool for solving problems that are either difficult or virtually impossible to solve in any other way. Topics covered in MATH 4391 provide an introduction to the subject, including basics from complex function theory: numbers, analytic functions, Cauchy-Riemann conditions, elementary functions, complex integration, Cauchy’s theorem and integral formula, power series, residues and applications.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
973
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K