News What State Would the US Be in if George W. Bush Had a Third Term as President?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If George W. Bush had served a third term as President, the United States would likely have faced continued military engagement in Afghanistan without significant healthcare reform. The defense budget would have remained inflated, reflecting Bush's historical spending patterns, which saw the gross debt increase from $5.6 trillion to $10.7 trillion during his presidency. The discussion highlights a consensus that while both parties recognize the need for healthcare reform, it would not have been realized under Bush's administration. The conversation also critiques the economic conditions left by Bush, suggesting that they contributed to the challenges faced by subsequent administrations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of U.S. presidential terms and their implications on policy.
  • Familiarity with U.S. defense budget trends and historical spending data.
  • Knowledge of healthcare reform debates in the U.S. political landscape.
  • Awareness of economic indicators and their significance in political discourse.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of the Bush administration's defense budget on U.S. military strategy.
  • Examine the historical context of healthcare reform efforts in the U.S. post-2008.
  • Analyze the economic conditions leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.
  • Explore the role of political ideology in shaping fiscal policy decisions during presidential terms.
USEFUL FOR

Political analysts, historians, economists, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of presidential policies on U.S. military and economic conditions.

  • #61
I think it was a Bill Moyer's 'person' that he was interviewing, and that person said that a republican spokesperson back in the 1920's set the goal for the republican party that they are still using, which is that the republicans WANT bad government so that they can make more money for themselves (the politicians) and for their contributors.

With bad government in place, there is less oversight to making money, he said.

Bad government is the goal of the Republican party.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
rewebster said:
I think it was a Bill Moyer's 'person' that he was interviewing, and that person said that a republican spokesperson back in the 1920's set the goal for the republican party that they are still using, which is that the republicans WANT bad government so that they can make more money for themselves (the politicians) and for their contributors.

With bad government in place, there is less oversight to making money, he said.

Bad government is the goal of the Republican party.

Now that you've had your fun, I have a few questions.
1.) Going back a few posts - what percentage of the total taxes paid did those upper income people pay?
2.) What percentage of those upper income people taking advantage of Bush tax cuts are actually Republicans and how many are Democrats?
It's time to support your nonsense.
 
  • #63
WhoWee said:
Now that you've had your fun, I have a few questions.
1.) Going back a few posts - what percentage of the total taxes paid did those upper income people pay?
2.) What percentage of those upper income people taking advantage of Bush tax cuts are actually Republicans and how many are Democrats?
It's time to support your nonsense.

what? you can't do your own research?

or are you just trying to get a liberal to do it for you...

so you can deny it anyway due to something else that you don't agree with?


Like I said, I am not defending the republicans morality of being greedy and self-serving--I'm just presenting the info...
 
  • #64
rewebster said:
what? you can't do your own research?

or are you just trying to get a liberal to do it for you...

so you can deny it anyway due to something else that you don't agree with?

Believe it or not - the rules also apply to liberals on the PF.
You need to support your nonsense.
 
  • #65
WhoWee said:
Believe it or not - the rules also apply to liberals on the PF.
You need to support your nonsense.

again, I did---read my posts--- and do your own research in a non-biased way

or just go ahead and believe only what just the republican spokes people like Limbaugh, Beck, Palin, etc say
 
  • #66
This thread has devolved into liberal/conservative bashing. Closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K