How Do You Integrate sin(2kz) from Negative Infinity to z?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amjad-sh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sin(2kz) from negative infinity to z. Participants explore the convergence of the integral and the implications of using limits in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to evaluate the integral directly, while others suggest using limits or contour integration to address convergence issues. Questions arise regarding the definition of the integral at infinity and the oscillatory nature of the sine function.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing various interpretations of the integral's convergence. Some have proposed using exponential damping to assign a value to the integral, while others emphasize the need for a rigorous approach. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the approaches discussed.

Contextual Notes

Several participants note that the integral does not converge in the traditional sense and highlight the challenges of dealing with oscillatory integrals in physics. The conversation reflects a mix of mathematical rigor and practical applications in physics.

amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
In fact, I am working on an condensed matter physics paper, where I reached to an integral of this form: $$\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kz) \, dz$$.
offcourse, I have to solve this integral.
Relevant Equations
There is no relevant equations.
##\int_{-\infty}^{z}sin(2kz)\,dz=\dfrac{-1}{2k} \Big [cos(2kz) \Big ]_{-\infty}^z=-\dfrac{cos(2kz)}{2k}+\dfrac{cos(-\infty)}{2k}##.
I ended up here, and I don't know how to proceed.
One recommended me to use contour integration, but I have no idea about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral does not converge in the traditional sense, but for particular applications assign a useful value using limits.

for example

$$\int_{-\infty}^{z} \sin(2 k t) \, dt \\
=\lim_{s\rightarrow 0^+}\int_{-\infty}^{z} \sin(2 k t) e^{s t}\, dt$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh
It's not well-defined. An integral like that is defined as a limit, ##\lim_{a \rightarrow -\infty} \int_a^z \sin(2kz) dz## and due to the oscillatory nature of the sine, that limit will oscillate over a range of values and never converge.

You absolutely don't just "plug in infinity". ##\infty## is not a real number and it doesn't have a cosine.

However, I know such beasts come up in physics and physicists do something not quite rigorous to define them. I suspect the different limit which @lurflurf has suggested is probably the right one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh
lurflurf said:
The integral does not converge in the traditional sense, but for particular applications assign a useful value using limits.

for example

$$\int_{-\infty}^{z} \sin(2 k t) \, dt \\
=\lim_{s\rightarrow 0^+}\int_{-\infty}^{z} \sin(2 k t) e^{s t}\, dt$$
##\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt) \, dt =\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt)e^{st} \, dt }##

Now , by using integration by parts:
let ##du=sin(2kt) \rightarrow u=\dfrac{-1}{2k}cos(2kt)##
## \quad v=e^{st} \rightarrow dv=se^{st}##

##\Longrightarrow \lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt)e^{st} \, dt }=\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\Big [-\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kt)e^{st} \Big ]_{-\infty}^{z}}+\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z}\dfrac{s}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{st} \, dt} ##
##= \lim_{ s \rightarrow 0+}{\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{sz}} +\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2k\infty)e^{-\infty}}+\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z}\dfrac{s}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{st} \, dt} ##
##=\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{sz}}+\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z}\dfrac{s}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{st} \, dt}##Now,##\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z}\dfrac{s}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{st} \, dt}=\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\dfrac{s}{2k} \Big [ \dfrac{1}{2k}sin(2kt)e^{st} \Big ]_{-\infty}^{z}}+\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+} {-\dfrac{s^2}{(2k)^2}\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kz)e^{st} \, dt}##
##=\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\dfrac{s}{(2k)^2}sin(2kz)e^{sz}}+\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+} {-\dfrac{s^2}{(2k)^2}\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kz)e^{st} \, dt}=\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+} {-\dfrac{s^2}{(2k)^2}\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kz)e^{st} \, dt}##

##\Longrightarrow \lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt)e^{st} \, dt \Big(1+\dfrac{s^2}{(2k)^2} \Big)}=-\lim_{ s \rightarrow 0^+}{\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kz)e^{sz}}##
##\Longrightarrow \int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt) \, dt=-\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kz)##

Is my answer right?
 
RPinPA said:
However, I know such beasts come up in physics and physicists do something not quite rigorous to define them.
HAHAHAHAHA :thumbup:
 
Well, well, well. Physicist know at such a point that they deal with distributions rather than usual functions. They are sloppy up to this point, getting an ill-defined and thus diverging integral. Then they remember (hopefully) their pedantic quantum-mechanics professor who told them in their QM 1 lecture that plane waves are to read as "generalized functions" or "distributions", and then they regularize their nonsensical integral from the sloppy derivation using an idea as in #2 :-).
 
I was trained in physics first, then mathematics. So I'm aware of the non-rigorous methods of physics and why they work out. For instance, treating differentials like dx as a finite thing for awhile before you decide it's now infinitesimal. There is something rigorous underneath, but the rigor is inconvenient.
 
amjad-sh said:
##\Longrightarrow \int_{-\infty}^{z} sin(2kt) \, dt=-\dfrac{1}{2k}cos(2kz)##

Is my answer right?

yes looks good
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amjad-sh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K