What Tense Formations Should I Use When Discussing Time Travel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the appropriate tense formations to use when discussing time travel, incorporating elements of grammar, humor, and references to a literacy test from 1918. Participants explore the complexities and nuances of language in the context of hypothetical scenarios involving time travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference a literacy test from 1918, questioning the implications of its content on understanding language.
  • There are humorous assertions about the translucency of "pernicious pedestrians," with some suggesting that this quality is conditional upon their state (e.g., deceased).
  • A participant humorously claims to be illiterate in multiple languages, contributing to the light-hearted tone of the discussion.
  • One participant argues that a contradiction exists in the terms "translucent" and "pernicious," suggesting that these qualities cannot coexist.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of additional tenses required for discussing time travel, referencing a fictional grammar book that humorously critiques the complexity of the subject.
  • There are playful remarks about the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in relation to the literacy test, adding a layer of social commentary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of humorous and speculative viewpoints, with no clear consensus on the correct tense formations or the implications of the discussed terms. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing ideas presented.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on humor and irony, and the discussion includes references to fictional works and absurd scenarios, which may limit the applicability of the arguments to serious linguistic analysis.

Science news on Phys.org
lisab said:
I'm not sure if pernicious pedestrians are translucent :frown:.
I think the answer is dependent on whether or not you're familiar with any ironic blast furnaces.
 
I am definitely illiterate.
 
Last edited:
Borek said:
I am definitely illiterate.
I am illiterate in more languages than you are. (nyah, nyah). I am barely literate in English, but have yet to establish that level of proficiency in another tongue.
 
zoobyshoe said:
I think the answer is dependent on whether or not you're familiar with any ironic blast furnaces.

http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/20000/3000/900/23960/23960.strip.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lisab said:
...based on this literacy test used by the Army in 1918:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_vault/2013/09/24/army_literacy_test_used_on_recruits_in_wwi.html

I'm not sure if pernicious pedestrians are translucent :frown:.

No, they are not.

Reasoning:
An infinitesimal titanic bulk is not possible.
Vagrants usually don't posess immaculate cravats.
Laconic messages are never verbose.

Therefore, pernicious pedestrians cannot be transluscent.


There's four versions of the test (starting on page 282) and all four use the same answer key. That way, all four tests can be distributed randomly without making the graders' task more difficult.

There was a serious problem with this test, though, when given in Florida. Deaf and blind men possessing crippled seeing eye dogs invariably failed. But what else is new? Having a hard life was nothing new to those guys.
 
I think there is a contradiction in terms here.
If a pedestrian is translucent, he cannot be pernicious.
 
BobG said:
Deaf and blind men possessing crippled seeing eye dogs invariably failed.

Especially if their blindness was caused by subjunctivitis.
 
  • #10
Be it was subjunctive, this sentence became pernicious. Like my cousin Anemia. Every allusion is an illusive illusion.

Write if you find work.
 
  • #11
jim mcnamara said:
Be it was subjunctive,

And don't forget the extra tenses needed to deal with time traveling:

You can arrive (mayan arrivan on-when) for any sitting you like without prior (late fore-when) reservation because you can book retrospectively, as it were, when you return to your own time (you can have on-book haventa forewhen presooning returningwenta retrohome).
(Douglas Adams, H2G2).

Time Traveler's Handbook of 1001 Tense Formations is a grammar book by Dr. Dan Streetmentioner. It is about what tense formations to use when discussing time travel, and is supposedly "the main work to consult on this matter."
However, the book is an exceptionally dull read,and most readers only get as far as the section on the Future Semiconditionally Modified Subinverted Subjunctive Intentional before giving up. Because of this, in later editions of the book all pages beyond this point have been left blank to save on printing costs.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
76
Views
44K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K