What to do when second partial derivative test is inconclusive

Click For Summary
When the second partial derivative test is inconclusive due to all second derivatives being zero at a critical point, alternative methods must be considered. One approach is to analyze the behavior of the function along different curves approaching the critical point, such as the axes or y=x, to determine if it behaves like a saddle point. Higher-order derivatives, such as the third derivative, can also provide insights, although they may not confirm the presence of an extremum. The specific function discussed is f(x,y) = (x^2)y + x(y^2), which requires further exploration to understand its nature near the critical point. Overall, examining the function's behavior along various paths can help clarify the situation.
Zoe-b
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two problems where there is a critical point of f(x,y) at (0,0), but the second derivatives and mixed second derivative are all zero. The second partial derivative test is therefore inconclusive- all the information I can find online/in my notes just says it is inconclusive and doesn't offer an alternative method. If anyone could give me a link or even just tell me what I should be googling that would be really helpful! Thanks.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I vaguely think I could show the critical point was a saddle point if I could show along one curve f(x,y) is positive as (x,y) -> (0,0) and along another curve f(x,y) is negative as (x,y) -> (0,0) but I have no theorem that states this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so in the single variable case you would consider the 3rd derivative

if you consider a passing along a line eg x or y axis, or y=x, as you say you could either consider the 3rd derivative, however whilst you may be able to show a saddle point, it won't be able to confirm an extremum
 
so what was the function?
 
The first one is f(x,y) = (x^2)y + x(y^2)

but I was really after ideas for a method not the solution.
 
well i don't know any cook book methods, but you could have a think about what happens to the higher order derivatives, or the previous idea

however for this case I would consider the line y=x (or the axes)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K