MHB What to include on a first elementary number theory course?

AI Thread Summary
A first elementary number theory course should include topics such as modular arithmetic, rational approximations, and applications like public-key cryptography. The course should be structured to motivate students, leveraging resources like "An Introduction to Number Theory" by Graham Everest and Thomas Ward, and "Roots to Research" by J.D. Sally and P.J. Sally, Jr. While public-key cryptography is an engaging application, it may require a separate course due to its complexity. Additionally, the concept of squaring the circle can be introduced, although it leans more towards geometry. Overall, a focus on modular arithmetic is essential for a comprehensive understanding of elementary number theory.
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
I have to teach a course in elementary number theory next academic year. What topics should be included on a first course in this area? What is best order of doing things? The students have a minimum background in proof but this is a second year undergraduate module.
I am looking for applications which will motivate the student in this subject.
Are there good resources on elementary number theory?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I like chapter 4 "Rational Approximations" from the book "Roots to Research: A Vertical Development of Mathematical Problems" by J.D. Sally and P.J. Sally, Jr. It can be downloaded from the AMS site by clicking on the "Preview Material". The book description says that it is for students of all levels starting from high school. I myself studied this material as an undergraduate, but also in a university-preparatory school.

Another interesting topic that touches number theory is squaring the circle. It took us a third of a semester during the fourth year in college to cover the theorem that $\pi$ is transcendental, so this fact should probably be given without a proof. However, it is interesting why every line segment built from a segment of length 1 using only compass and straightedge has an algebraic length. I don't think I have ever studied a rigorous proof. However, this may be more of a geometrical than number-theoretical theorem.

Finally, I would look at public-key cryptography, but I don't know if it is possible to omit enough details to make it into both an accessible and a rigorous course.
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Perhaps the the following book by Graham Everest and Thomas Ward will provide you good ideas

An Introduction to Number Theory
From the title page:

"An Introduction to
Number Theory

With 16 Figures"

I wanted to exclaim, "Yeah, this is not geometry, baby! You should be happy with just a handful of pictures". (Smile) Also, the beginning of "Alice in Wonderland" comes to mind.

Alice was beginning to get very tired of sitting by her sister on the bank, and of having nothing to do: once or twice she had peeped into the book her sister was reading, but it had no pictures or conversations in it, `and what is the use of a book,' thought Alice `without pictures or conversation?'
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Finally, I would look at public-key cryptography, but I don't know if it is possible to omit enough details to make it into both an accessible and a rigorous course.

I don't think so. It's fun and all as an example of applications of number theory but without computational complexity theory and an actual course in cryptography the students are going to be lost. Cryptography needs its own separate course IMHO

Also, on topic: modular arithmetic. The single most important tool. No elementary number theory course is complete without it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top