What to write in a CV for PhD application?

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cosmogirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Application Cv Phd
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to effectively write a CV for PhD applications, particularly focusing on the inclusion of past research experiences, the relevance of hobbies, and the expectations of selection committees in the UK and Germany.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to include undergraduate research projects in their CV, expressing uncertainty about their relevance and the potential impression on the committee.
  • Another participant asserts that all research, including undergraduate work, should be included in the CV, along with publications and recognitions, while suggesting that hobbies are generally not necessary.
  • A different contributor shares insights from their experience with PhD interviews in Germany and the Netherlands, emphasizing the importance of detailing research projects and linking them to the desired PhD position.
  • This contributor also notes the significance of recommendation letters and the potential for candidates to be preferred based on recommendations rather than solely on their CVs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the inclusion of undergraduate research and hobbies in the CV. While some advocate for including all research experiences, others are uncertain about their relevance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best practices for CV writing in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention specific expectations from selection committees in different countries, indicating that practices may vary between the UK and Germany. There is also a recognition of the importance of tailoring the CV to the specific PhD position.

cosmogirl
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm finally preparing to apply for PhD, so it is time to write a good CV.

My situation: I'm about to finish my MSc degree (research based) and intend to apply to several universities in Europe, mostly in the UK and Germany.

Do you think I should list the research projects I did during my undergraduate degree? That was quite a while ago, and I barely remember what the pojects were about, aside from the title :rolleyes:. Also, they were in very different fields from what I do now (and am interested in continuing doing) so the commitee might think my research interests and skills are different from what they now are. On the other hand, that might show that I have knowledge and experience in very diverse fields. Or not?

Also, I've seen in some CV's I found on the web that some people list their hobbies and stuff like that. Does it help? I stress that my question refers mainly to the UK and Germany.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One's CV should included any research performed - even as an undergrad - and publications.

Most professionals would include awards or recognitions, community service or participation, but not usually hobbies. Some may include interests rather than hobbies.
 
Thanks for your help Astronuc!
 
I will tell you about my experience and the observations I made during my 3 interviews/assessment procedures for PhD positions in Germany (and the Netherlands; you might want to check out: www.academictransfer.nl ).

The most important thing to keep in mind is that the professors and postdocs want to know how good you are as a researcher, and more importantly, how you would fit in in their groups.

1. CV
This has to be precise. Only the listing of the projects which you have done won't work - try to mention what and, if possible, how (i.e. methods) you did the projects. So, maybe 2/3 short statements for each project.

2. Cover Letter
Try to pick important projects you have done which can be linked to the PhD position/project you are applying for. Highlight what you have learned, skills acquired, working settings (as in either independent or group work).

3. Interview/Assessment
If you are shortlisted, most places will invite you to their labs/working places; meeting with the group members. Here in Holland, candidates are normally asked to give a talk on a topic of candidates' choice (eg. master's thesis) for 25-30 mins, followed by questions.

I hope that will give you a rough idea. BUT, not everyone goes through all that painful procedure. Most professors prefer candidates recommended to them by other professors or researchers. Thus make sure you have excellent recommendation letters.

I don't much time at the moment..will try to write more later; feel free to send a PM.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K