What type of equation is this one?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Beerdrinker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Type
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the type of equation represented by the functional relationship given in the problem, specifically the equation involving the function ##f(\alpha, \beta; x)##. Participants explore the nature of the equation and how to approach solving it, including the implications of the parameters involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a functional equation and proposes a specific form for the solution, suggesting that ##f(\alpha, \beta; x) = \left(\alpha + \beta x^a\right)^b## with the condition that ##a \cdot b = -4##.
  • Several participants seek clarification on the nature of the variables involved, questioning whether ##x##, ##\alpha##, ##\beta##, ##\gamma##, and ##\delta## are real or complex numbers, and their independence from each other.
  • Another participant elaborates on the assumptions made regarding the parameters, indicating that ##\gamma## and ##\delta## may depend on ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, and clarifies the relationships between the parameters in the context of the functional equation.
  • One participant identifies the equation as a functional equation, referencing external material for further context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and relationships of the parameters involved, and there is no consensus on the best approach to solve the equation or the implications of the proposed solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions of the parameters and their relationships are not fully established, leading to ambiguity in the interpretation of the functional equation.

Beerdrinker
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am struggling with a problem, where in the middle of my calculations I need to determine a function ##f(\alpha, \beta; x)##, namely the function of ##x## parametrized by ##\alpha## and ##\beta##, from the following equation

$$f\left(\alpha, \beta;\frac{1}{x}\right) = x^4f(\gamma, \delta; x).$$

So the ##f(1/x)## on the LHS and ##f(x)## on the RHS may differ in parametrization. Somehow I found that this equation admits the following solution

$$f(\alpha, \beta; x) = \left(\alpha + \beta x^a\right)^b $$

where ##a\cdot b = -4##. Although, this is probably not the most general solution.

So my question is what type of equation this one is? And how one should approach such equation?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Some clarifying questions:

Is x a non-zero real number?

Are \alpha, \beta real numbers?

Are \gamma and \delta real number constants (independent of \alpha, \beta, x)?

In your example, you're assuming \gamma = \alpha = \delta = \beta?
 
disregardthat said:
Some clarifying questions:

Is x a non-zero real number?

Are \alpha, \beta real numbers?

Are \gamma and \delta real number constants (independent of \alpha, \beta, x)?

##f(x)## is well defined and restricted to either ##x>0## or ##x<0##.
##\alpha##, ##\beta##, ##\gamma##, ##\delta## in general may be complex and independent of ##x## (they parametrize function ##f(x)##).
However ##\gamma##, ##\delta## may be functions of ##\alpha##, ##\beta##.

disregardthat said:
In your example, you're assuming \gamma = \alpha = \delta = \beta?

In the example I provided previously we have

$$f\left(\alpha, \beta; x\right) = \left(\alpha + \beta x^{a} \right)^b \Rightarrow f\left(\alpha, \beta; \frac{1}{x}\right) = \left(\alpha + \beta x^{-a} \right)^b = x^{-ab}\left(\alpha x^a + \beta\right)^b = x^{4}f(\beta, \alpha; x)$$
Where the assumption ##ab = -4## was used. So in this case ##\alpha = \delta## and ##\beta = \gamma## and are not neccesarily equal.

Sorry for not making this clear enough earlier.
 
Last edited:
Anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
946
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K