What Undervalued Books Have You Discovered?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Demystifier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification and sharing of undervalued or lesser-known books in the fields of physics and mathematics. Participants provide personal recommendations and insights into the content and quality of these texts, covering various topics such as thermodynamics, quantum field theory, and linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight H. Muirhead's "The Physics of Elementary Particles" as comparable in quality to Bjorken and Drell's work, suggesting it deserves more recognition.
  • Radu Paul Lungu's "Thermodynamics" is noted for its thorough treatment of thermodynamics under electric and magnetic fields, addressing subtle points that are often overlooked.
  • Jonsson and Yngvason's "Waves and Distributions" is praised for its concise presentation of distribution theory and Fourier analysis, although some participants express concerns about its abstract passages.
  • Kostrikin and Manin's "Linear Algebra and Geometry" is mentioned as a potentially undervalued text that some participants found beneficial.
  • Sommerfeld's six-volume theory series is described as a clear assessment of classical theoretical physics, despite being less utilized today.
  • Pauli's theory series is acknowledged for its comprehensive coverage of classical physics and quantum mechanics, though some content is considered outdated.
  • Schwinger's book on Source theory and Eisenberg and Greiner's work on Nuclear Physics are mentioned as books that participants have started but not fully explored.
  • There is a debate regarding the relevance of teaching Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (QM) in the context of modern Quantum Field Theory (QFT), with differing opinions on its pedagogical value.
  • Some participants argue that understanding the historical development of theories, including Relativistic QM, is important, while others believe it complicates the learning of modern concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the value of specific texts and the teaching of historical theories in relation to modern physics. There is no clear consensus on the necessity of including Relativistic QM in the curriculum, with some advocating for its exclusion and others supporting its inclusion for historical context.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the recommended texts, and some acknowledge the limitations of their own knowledge regarding the content and pedagogical approaches discussed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students, educators, and professionals in physics and mathematics looking for recommendations on lesser-known but valuable texts in their fields.

  • #61
There is another book by John R. Taylor which doesn't get mentioned much anywhere:
Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions

I remember it to be really well-written. In principle, I think that it is a virtue that it doesn't include QFT because you don't get sidetracked from the fundamentals of scattering this way. The only drawback is that it has 500 pages so I didn't have the time to read much of it. ;-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
kith said:
There is another book by John R. Taylor which doesn't get mentioned much anywhere:
Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions

I remember it to be really well-written. In principle, I think that it is a virtue that it doesn't include QFT because you don't get sidetracked from the fundamentals of scattering this way. The only drawback is that it has 500 pages so I didn't have the time to read much of it. ;-)
There are books with way more than 500 pages... :-D
 
  • #63
Yes but it depends on how deep you can dig into a subject during university. Most books on quantum mechanics hardly spend any pages at all on non-relativistic scattering, so 500 pages are a lot.
 
  • #64
kith said:
Not really undervalued in comparison to similar books but I know many phycicists who've never read a single book on its topic:
John Taylor - Introduction to Error Analysis

kith said:
There is another book by John R. Taylor which doesn't get mentioned much anywhere:
Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions

I remember it to be really well-written. In principle, I think that it is a virtue that it doesn't include QFT because you don't get sidetracked from the fundamentals of scattering this way. The only drawback is that it has 500 pages so I didn't have the time to read much of it. ;-)

Both of these books are on my shelf. I haven't completely read either, but I have read bits of both. When I was a grad student, my university offered a grad course on scattering, and Taylor was used as the text. I didn't take the course, but a friend did, and she gave me the book.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kith
  • #65
George Jones said:
I ordered these books yesterday from amazon.com and was charged $29.08 and $28.83 respectively. Today, the prices are $116.95 and $115.70. (All prices in Canadian dollars; amounts would be less in US dollars.)
Ah! You might be tempted to resell them and make a hefty profit :-)

I hope you enjoy them, I now feel a bit responsible for suggesting them. Knowing you a bit, I fear the book by Garrity may be a bit too basic, but I still hope you will enjoy some of it.

Talking about QFT (since you mentioned wanting to learn more about it in another post), here is another book that I consider good and undervalued:

The conceptual Framework of Quantum Field Theory by A. Duncan.

He has a very original and deep presentation of the concepts of QFT.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and dextercioby
  • #66
nrqed said:
I just got the two volumes by Manioukan, I am looking forward to reading them.

I would also not call Cohen-Tannoudji undervalued, it was even the textbook used in my undergrad QM one year class. Maybe it is less known in English speaking universities though.
Did you like the two-volume textbook on QFT by Manoukian?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
62
Views
56K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
26
Views
19K