What university has the best physicse education in the world?

  • Context: Schools 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarfi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Education University
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the university that offers the best physics education globally. Participants explore various factors influencing this assessment, including undergraduate versus graduate programs, specific fields of physics, and the criteria for determining "best" education.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the definition of "best" varies based on whether the focus is on undergraduate or graduate education, specific fields of physics, and personal learning preferences.
  • Caltech and MIT are frequently mentioned as top contenders for rigorous physics programs, with some arguing Caltech has a more challenging curriculum.
  • Others argue that the rigor of a program can be subjective and that factors like the quality of teaching, academic atmosphere, and personal interests play significant roles in a student's education.
  • One participant emphasizes that no single university can provide comprehensive knowledge of all physics topics, suggesting that students should reassess their expectations for their education.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of university rankings, particularly the US News rankings, with some participants advocating for a more nuanced approach to evaluating programs based on individual needs and specialties.
  • Some participants express that the university environment and available resources can significantly impact learning, while others argue that personal initiative and external resources can mitigate limitations imposed by a university's curriculum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on which university is the best for physics education. Multiple competing views remain regarding the importance of various factors in determining the quality of education.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the subjective nature of "rigor" in curricula, the variability of student experiences, and the dependence on personal learning styles and goals. The discussion also highlights the challenges in relying on rankings to assess educational quality.

Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
What university offers the best physics education in the world, can you name the top 5? Is it cambridge, MIT, or are there any good ones in europe or japan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends. Are we talking undergrad? Grad? What field of physics? How do you measure "best"? Is it the atmosphere of the school, the academics, the chance for networking with experts, the school's name recognition..?
 
It's Caltech. No questions asked.I'm joking. There's no answer to this that is particularly meaningful without greater specifications. A lot of Ivy Leagues, Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech, MIT are top notch in Physics and Mathematical Physics, to the point where it is silly to really compare which is better, since it depends on which area.

When it comes to which is better for undergrad, people are often thinking about the caliber of the physics students, and rigor of the degree. Caltech and MIT both come to mind as some of the most brutal programs for physics. For graduate school, it is a different story - it depends highly on your specialization, and a school that is overall ranked low in a system such as US News may actually be top notch in certain areas, which is what matters when you want to look for academic jobs.

Check out the US News rankings of grad departments (I think grad rankings are where actual field specialties are taken into account heavily, whereas for undergrad, a school like Caltech may be listed as overall lower than some Ivy League type schools which meet a broader class of needs). It's not actually a great measure, since the differences among the best programs are a bit ad hoc in the listings, but it gives some idea.
 
MIT is rigorous, but it doesn't hold a candle to Caltech. Caltech is the only school that has a truly rigorous math and physics curriculum for undergraduate studies.
 
Society needs you to become a good physicist and help solve problems in everyday life. No one cares about this prestige nonsense :rolleyes:
 
Edin_Dzeko said:
Society needs you to become a good physicist and help solve problems in everyday life. No one cares about this prestige nonsense :rolleyes:


Well, i actually do not care about the prestige, all i want is a great school where i can learn everything about quantum mechanics, special relativity, and just everythint you can know about physics. Is there any school that does that?
 
There is no place on Earth that meets your criteria. Reevaluate what you want out of your physics education, because you will never know everything you can know about physics, or even about the specialty that you end up going into.
 
Leptos said:
MIT is rigorous, but it doesn't hold a candle to Caltech. Caltech is the only school that has a truly rigorous math and physics curriculum for undergraduate studies.

Please define "truly rigorous".
 
I agree it is really difficult to decide because there are so many factors to consider, such as the quality of lecturing, the atmosphere, the content of the course, the popularity of the university (in the university league table) and so on. A lot of my friends say that Oxbridge is the best for physics but from the research I have done I think Imperial sounds like a place that would suit me just as well, although nowadays it is so competitive (applicants applying with all A* at GCSE).

You need to look at prospectuses, look at more than just where the university ranks. For example, Buckingham actually have the highest student satisfaction in the UK (source: http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk). For me, I don't think the university can stop me learning what I want to learn. With the internet, libraries, and many other resources, there's no reason my learning can be significantly limited depending on the university I go to.

Some people like Kingston because it's the easiest to get into and hence a lot of my friends are applying, but I've heard a lot of rumours that there is a high frequency of bullying there. However, I've only heard that from a few people so it's likely to not be reliable.

If you are truly passionate about maths or physics then you shouldn't let the university stop you. Do as much wider reading as you can on your subject.
 
  • #10
Leptos said:
MIT is rigorous, but it doesn't hold a candle to Caltech. Caltech is the only school that has a truly rigorous math and physics curriculum for undergraduate studies.
Oh boy...
 
  • #11
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
For me, I don't think the university can stop me learning what I want to learn. With the internet, libraries, and many other resources, there's no reason my learning can be significantly limited depending on the university I go to.


This! 'nuff said :approve:
 
  • #12
Jarfi said:
What university offers the best physics education in the world, can you name the top 5? Is it cambridge, MIT, or are there any good ones in europe or japan.

It depends on the student. People learn well in different environments.
 
  • #13
deRham said:
Caltech and MIT both come to mind as some of the most brutal programs for physics.

The MIT physics program curiously is not that brutal. One thing about MIT is that since the students are selected going in, you don't have too many weed out classes.

Check out the US News rankings of grad departments (I think grad rankings are where actual field specialties are taken into account heavily

No don't do that. You should totally ignore US News rankings because they are generally clueless about physics programs.

Since the differences among the best programs are a bit ad hoc in the listings, but it gives some idea.

Not even close. The USWR rankings are anti-indicators because you'll get yourself in more trouble if you pay attention to those.
 
  • #14
Leptos said:
MIT is rigorous, but it doesn't hold a candle to Caltech. Caltech is the only school that has a truly rigorous math and physics curriculum for undergraduate studies.

I might have something useful to say here because I took the physics program at MIT as an undergraduate.

The MIT physics program is rather non-rigorous, and that's a good thing. One thing about MIT is that they give you enough freedom to find your own path and learn stuff that you are interested in. Also the classroom teaching at MIT isn't particularly spectacular, but it's the general environment of the school that makes it "magical."

Something that I thought was great about MIT is that they try to get you to not think in terms of silos, so you get a good technical education, but also a good classical liberal arts education, which you'll need to make use of your physics degree.
 
  • #15
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
IFor me, I don't think the university can stop me learning what I want to learn. With the internet, libraries, and many other resources, there's no reason my learning can be significantly limited depending on the university I go to.

Actually they can...

1) The university can pump you with enough required courses and weed out nonsense so that you don't have time to work on what interests you.

2) The internet, libraries, and other resources don't come for free. Putting together a good research library is really hard work and takes a lot of $$$$. Also, a good university will have seminars, interesting people, new research, coffee shops, pizza places. It's also hard to put those together.

Also, what about the "next big thing?"

The *big* reason that going to MIT was cool was that I got free access to the internet and an e-mail account. This isn't a big deal today but, remember that I went to school in 1987. I was probably one of the first people in the entire world in August 1991 to download and use the world wide web, and I remember the moment when I got the web browser working, and thought to myself "this might be interesting."

The stuff that people work on at MIT will eventually make it to all schools and physics curriculum, but there is some value in getting to use a technology five to ten years before everyone else has heard of it.

If you are truly passionate about maths or physics then you shouldn't let the university stop you. Do as much wider reading as you can on your subject.

If you are passionate about physics but everyone else in the university doesn't give a damn about physics or math and is more interested in football, you'll find it an extremely unpleasant experience.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K