What would happen if a spring was between two moving objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lluke9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Click For Summary
When a spring is placed between two moving objects, it exerts equal and opposite forces on both objects, regardless of their masses. The acceleration of each object depends on its mass, with the lighter object accelerating more quickly. The spring does not "pop" into equilibrium; it continues to push both masses until it reaches its unstretched length. Consequently, the lighter mass ultimately receives more kinetic energy due to its higher acceleration and shorter interaction time with the spring. The center of mass of the system remains stationary throughout the interaction.
lluke9
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hey people!

So, what would happen? (This is not a school question, I was just wondering!)

Say, a spring is between a totally unmoving wall and a 1 kg object. The spring pushes on the object with 1 Newton of force. The block accelerates at 1 m/s^2.

But... what if the wall WASN'T unmoving... what it it were ANOTHER object with a mass of 2 kg?
Would the spring somehow split the force 2/3 to 1/3? Or split the force evenly among the two blocks, making one accelerate at .5 m/s^2 and the other at .25 m/s^2?
What will it do!?
Can someone explain what would happen and why? I think I can imagine what would happen, but I'm not sure why.

Thanks and hi!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

When a spring pushes on two objects, there is essentially one force, pushing in two different directions. It doesn't matter if the objects are stationary or moving.
 
So even if the two objects had different masses, the spring would push both with the same force?
Hmm...

Then, will the spring push for a longer time on the object with less mass or more mass?
In other words, which block receives more work?
I'm THINKING it's the one with more mass, because it will accelerate slower and stay on the spring longer.
But when the lighter mass leaves the spring, won't the spring just pop into equilibrium without something to push off of? So that means the one with less mass actually receives more work...

Sorry, but can I get some more help here?
 
The spring pushes on both masses for the same amount of time, with equal and opposite forces at each end. It doesn't "pop" into equlibrium. Both masses will leave the spring when it reaches its unstretched length and stops applying any force.

You seem to be assuming both masses are initially at rest, though you don't actually say that. Because all the forces within the system are equal and opposite, the center of mass of the complete system never moves.

So if the masses are m_1 and m_2, their final velocities will be -p/m_1 and p/m_2 where p is the momentum of one mass, and the kinetic energies will by p^2/(2m_1) and p^2/(2m_2). So you are right, the lighter mass gets more kinetic energy.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K