What would happen to capitalist economies if technology stopped advancing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter avant-garde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the implications for capitalist economies if technological advancement were to cease. It examines the relationship between business and technology, questioning whether one drives the other and what the consequences would be for production and consumption patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the limits of technological improvement, suggesting that even incremental advancements, like those in car manufacturing, could still be considered progress.
  • One viewpoint posits that if technology stagnated, production costs would decrease significantly, as existing products would always be sellable, reducing the need for research and development.
  • A participant reflects on the persistence of older technologies, citing examples like vintage cars in Cuba, to illustrate how technology can remain relevant over time.
  • Another participant argues that without new technology, economies might shift towards producing consumable items with planned obsolescence, leading to a focus on cheaper, less durable products.
  • There is a suggestion that the absence of technological advancement could lead to a reliance on traditional goods, such as books and music, which continue to hold value despite technological changes.
  • A more extreme perspective is presented, proposing that if technology reached a limit, society could regress significantly, metaphorically "bombing ourselves back into the stone age."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the relationship between business and technology, with no clear consensus on whether one drives the other or how economies would adapt to a lack of technological progress. Multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the nature of technological advancement and its impact on economic structures, which are not fully explored or resolved. The implications of planned obsolescence and consumer behavior are also mentioned but not deeply analyzed.

avant-garde
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
What would happen to capitalist economies if technology stopped advancing?

Basically, does business drive technology, or does technology drive business?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
What's the limit here? Can Ford come out with new and improved cars, or does that count as an advance in car technology?

If nothing can ever be improved again, the cost to produce things would drop dramatically as it's guaranteed currently produced products would always be sellable, meaning you don't have to spend on R&D or the startup costs for manufacturing new products, and the cost of starting up the manufacturing process of current products becomes negligible as the number of products sold goes to infinity
 
avant-garde said:
What would happen to capitalist economies if technology stopped advancing?

Basically, does business drive technology, or does technology drive business?

Well, I think there's certain dependence between it. Without money, you can't exactly have new products, eliminating expenses is not real in this world. (Money that directly goes to prototypes from the research, the researchers getting what they need for live, even if the researchers get it "free" someone is still playing for it, starting the manufacturing process, it needs money)

But from technology, come new business models, different ways of selling and buying, so how to separate them?



WhoWee said:
It makes me think of those photos of 1950's era automobiles driving around in Cuba in the 1990's or later.:smile:

http://www.autoblog.com/2006/05/15/vintage-american-iron-thriving-in-cuba/

+1
 
Kys91 said:
+1

Since you brought up +1 (and this is about technology) - here's one for Cyrus.:smile:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
if we reach the limit, we could always just bomb ourselves back into the stone age and start over.
 
If there was no new technology, then the economy would likely depend much more on consumable items and planned obsolescence. I think there might be more incentive to build cheap junk that would fall apart in a few years and require replacing rather than relying on being able to provide new products. Afterall, old technology does still sell...you do still buy pens and paper, don't you?
 
Books, movies, music, television shows, artwork, ect ect
 

Similar threads

Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K