Whats the deal with an Engineering Technology degree?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the value and recognition of an Engineering Technology degree, particularly from Cal Poly Pomona, and its comparison to a traditional Engineering degree. Participants explore perceptions of the degree in the job market, its accreditation status, and the potential career paths available to graduates.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that the Engineering Technology degree may be perceived as equivalent to a technician trade school degree rather than a full engineering degree.
  • Others argue that Cal Poly Pomona's Engineering Technology program is accredited and offers a pathway to becoming a Professional Registered Engineer, which raises questions about its legitimacy and acceptance in the industry.
  • One participant points out that many engineering companies specifically require traditional engineering degrees, suggesting that job applications may be filtered out based on degree type.
  • Another participant highlights that while there are successful individuals without traditional degrees, this does not imply that the Engineering Technology degree is equally respected or recognized by employers.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of marketing an Engineering Technology degree compared to a traditional engineering degree, with some suggesting that it may limit job opportunities to non-engineering positions.
  • Some participants encourage a deeper inquiry into the differences between the two degrees, questioning what specific aspects of the Engineering Technology degree may be viewed as lesser qualifications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the value and recognition of the Engineering Technology degree compared to a traditional Engineering degree. There is no consensus on whether the degree is respected by employers or if it provides equivalent career opportunities.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying accreditation statuses and the potential challenges in obtaining a Professional Engineer license with an Engineering Technology degree, indicating that the discussion is influenced by state-specific regulations and employer preferences.

tempneff
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
So I have plans to transfer to Cal Poly Pomona in Southern California next year. They offer a bachelors of science in engineering technology. I thought this sounded like a trade school degree until I spoke to one of the professors in that department. He made it seem that this degree was equivalent to an Engineering degree but with a focus on real world application of engineering concepts rather than derivation of them.


Problem is...everyone I have asked in 'the real world' has never heard of such a degree and everyone relates it to a technician trade school degree.

Does anyone here have this degree? It sounds really interesting and right up my alley, unless of course its isn't respected by employers.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Typically - but not always - they are not accredited.

If you do a search, we've had this discussion before. Bottom line: if you want to be an engineer, get an engineering degree.
 
I get that. But Cal Poly Pomona is the ranked 12th in the nation for engineering. They are accredited with ABET for Engineering Technology specifically. I am not talking about Devry or ITT tech.

They are calling their graduates "Applied Engineers" and say that one can even be a Professional Registered Engineer. This is from the PELSG website http://www.pels.ca.gov/applicants/faq_eng.pdf
[PLAIN]http://tempneff.com/3.PNG

If its a bologna degree then how are these things possible and how did this guy get to be a chief engineer at Boeing. http://www.csupomona.edu/~ecet/alumni.htm
[PLAIN]http://tempneff.com/2.PNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tempneff said:
If its a bologna degree then how are these things possible and how did this guy get to be a chief engineer at Boeing.
I didn't say it is a bologna degree, and it is possible to do a lot of things, but that doesn't make the paths equivalent. A few points:

1. I know for a fact that many engineering companies require their engineers to have engineering degrees. Particularly in the age of internet job applications, you'll get rejected for many jobs by a computer program, without a person ever looking at your other qualifications. You may want to search Monster.com for a sampling.

2. As you showed, the PE path is a little harder with the ET degree. In some states it may not be possible to get a PE with an ET degree, but I'm not certain.

3. Maybe you should turn this around and ask what is different about the ET degree. If they were equivalent, it would be redundant to have both. So what are you getting in one that you aren't getting in the other? Or perhaps more to the point, why are they not considered equivalent by the state boards? What is missing from the ET degree that makes it a lesser qualification (according to the pdf you linked)?
 
tempneff said:
If its a bologna degree then how are these things possible and how did this guy get to be a chief engineer at Boeing.

You can't generalize from one example.

I used to work for a guy who ran a methods development group in an aerospace company with a comparable international status to Boeing. He had a string of published papers in journals like the International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering. He even had one of his discoveries named after him: http://www.nafems.org/resources/analysis_terms/terms/BARLOW-POINTS/

He didn't have ANY degree. He left at school age 16 and started by riveting aircraft wings together. After a few years he got bored with doing that and went to evening classes at a local college to start learning some math...

But I wouldn't recommend you to try following the same career plan.
 
Yes. I often harp on the purpose of college being to prepare for a career. So then you should try to set yourself up for the easiest/smoothest career path possible. An engineering degree sets you up for an easier/smoother career path than an ET degree.
 
russ_watters said:
An engineering degree sets you up for an easier/smoother career path than an ET degree.

This statement from russ is probably the most important thing you need to consider. Regardless of your actual coursework, it WILL be more difficult to sell that degree across the board. Only a select few (like your example) may really be sold on it. That means that IN GENERAL, for all potential employers, it will be more difficult.

If you have a specific "in" with that degree, or if you want to gamble on being more successful on that coursework to get hired, that's on you. You can bet on most employers simply not accepting it and the rest of them being wary of it. That means you'll most likely have to settle for a non-engineering position (a normal technician).

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the degree itself, or that somebody shouldn't be trying to blaze the trail for it, but do you want to gamble on being that person?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K