What's the Difference Between Zero Divisors and Torsion Elements?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CSteiner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Torsion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between zero divisors and torsion elements in the context of algebraic structures. A zero divisor is defined within a ring, where an element x is a zero divisor if there exists a non-zero element y such that xy=0. In contrast, a torsion element pertains to a module, where an element z is torsion if there exists a non-zero divisor x in the ring such that xz=0. The conversation also highlights variations in definitions among different authors, specifically noting that Dummit and Foote provide a broader definition of torsion elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and its properties
  • Familiarity with modules and their definitions
  • Knowledge of commutative and non-commutative algebra
  • Basic concepts of abelian groups and subgroup orders
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions of zero divisors in various algebraic structures
  • Explore the concept of torsion elements in modules over different types of rings
  • Investigate the implications of commutativity in algebraic definitions
  • Review Dummit and Foote's definitions of torsion elements for broader understanding
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in advanced linear algebra, particularly those studying modules and ring theory, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts for learners.

CSteiner
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
So I've been studying advanced linear algebra and have started learning about modules. However, I am having a hard time understanding the difference between a zero divisor and a torsion elements. The definitions seem extremely similar. Can someone offer a good definition of each and an explanation of the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i looked in atiyah macdonald and found this.

zero divisor is a concept applied to a ring, while torsion element is the analogous concept applied to a module. i.e. in a ring A, x is a zero divisor if xy=0 for some y≠0 in A.

If A is a ring and M is an A module, an element z of m is a torison element if xz=0 for some non zero divisor x in A.e.g. in an abelian group M, hence a module over the integers, an element z of M is torsion if and only if it generates a subgroup of finite order, i.e. if and only if nz = 0 for some n ≠0. in the integers there are of course no zero divisors (except 0).
 
Last edited:
Okay I think I understand now. However, I am noticing that the first definition invokes right multiplication whereas the second definition invokes left multiplication. In a module over a commutative ring this obviously won't make a difference, but is there some sort of subtle significance in the non commutative case?
 
i was thinking of the commutative case as i always do. (i read it in atiyah macdonald's book "commutative algebra".) in the non commutative case i suppose one has more notions, left zero divisor, right zero divisor, and a torsion element should be annihilated by a ring element which is neither i suppose, i.e. a "regular" element, but i am not an expert.
 
Okay, that makes sense, thanks!
 
there seems however to be some variation among different authors as Dummit and Foote e.g. define torsion elements more broadly, as any z such that xz=0 for a non zero element x of the ring, without requiring that x is not zero divisior. the more restriced definition came from a wiki article i found.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
983
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
956
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K