What's the Mistake in Transforming the Differential Equation Bases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kasse
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a differential equation of the form y'' + ay' + by = 0, given specific bases involving complex exponentials. Participants are examining the relationships between the coefficients and the roots of the characteristic equation derived from these bases.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of complex conjugate roots on the coefficients a and b. There are attempts to derive the characteristic equation and its roots, with some questioning the methods used to arrive at the equations. Others suggest using the sum and product of the roots to formulate the differential equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationships between the roots and coefficients. There is a focus on clarifying misunderstandings regarding the transformation of the bases and the application of the characteristic equation. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential mistakes in the calculations and suggest alternative approaches to derive the differential equation. There is an emphasis on understanding the properties of the roots and their implications for the coefficients.

kasse
Messages
383
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Find a differential eq. y''+ay'+by=0 with this basis: exp(-1-i)x , exp(-1+i)x

2. The attempt at a solution

I see from this that the solutions of the characteristic eq. is two complex conjugates, and that a^2-4b=-4.

Substitution gives me the eq. -2i-a+ai+b=0, and combining these two gives me

a=(1/2) v (1/2)-i

Then I calcutale b when a=(1/2)

b=(17/16)

So that the eq. is

y''+0.5y'+(17/16)y=0

Looks quite nice, but when I transform the bases (exp(-x)*sinx and exp(-x)*cosx) and substitute, it proves not to be correct.

What's my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kasse said:

Homework Statement



Find a differential eq. y''+ay'+by=0 with this basis: exp(-1-i)x , exp(-1+i)x

2. The attempt at a solution

I see from this that the solutions of the characteristic eq. is two complex conjugates, and that a^2-4b=-4.

Can you explain how you got the above equation?
 
learningphysics said:
Can you explain how you got the above equation?

The roots of the characteristic eq. are 0.5(-a (+/-) sqrt(a^2-4c))

Since the two solutions are complex numbers, a^2-4c must be negative, more precisely -4, since the imaginary part of the complex solutions is (+/-) 1.
 
kasse said:
The roots of the characteristic eq. are 0.5(-a (+/-) sqrt(a^2-4c))

Since the two solutions are complex numbers, a^2-4c must be negative, more precisely -4, since the imaginary part of the complex solutions is (+/-) 1.

I see... you must have made a mistake when you solved the two equations... I'd just take the sum and product of the roots... then you can write out the equation:

s^2 - qs + p... where q is the sum of the roots and p is the product...

then you get a = -q and b = p for the differential equation

or you can just multiply out:

(s - (-1 - i))(s - (-1 + i))
 
Ah, so I use the superposition principle and substitute the sum of Y1 and Y2 into the original eq?
 
No, I'm not using the superposition principle here. Since you know that the basis is exp(-1-i)x , exp(-1+i)x... you immediately know that the characteristic equation has roots (-1-i) and (-1+i).

or another way to think about it... you know that the characterstic equation is:
s^2 + as + b

This means that any function of the form e^sx that satisfies the equation must have the property that s^2 + as + b =0... ie s=(-1-i) must satisfy this equation, and s = (-1+i) must satisfy this equation... ie these are the two roots of the equation... Once you know the roots of a degree-2 equation r1 and r2... then you immediately know the form of the equation... s^2 - (r1+r2)s + r1r2... which you can also get by (s-r1)(s-r2)

You can also plug in -1-i into the equation and -1+i into the equation, then get 2 equations in 2 unknowns (a and b) and solve... but this is a little more roundabout way to do the problem I think...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K