I What's the proof that R2 /(R+h) = (1 – 2h/R)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Karagoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of the formula for acceleration due to gravity at height h, expressed as g1 = g (1 – 2h/R). The transition from R^2 /(R+h)^2 to 1/(1 + h/R)^2 involves dividing both the numerator and denominator by R^2. The assumption that h is much smaller than R allows for the simplification using a Taylor series expansion, retaining only the first term. This leads to the final expression of (1 – 2h/R). Understanding these steps clarifies the mathematical reasoning behind the derivation.
Karagoz
Messages
51
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
When proving formula for acceleration due to gravity at height h – with derivation, there are some steps I don't understand.
Hi,

On this link: https://physicsteacher.in/2020/07/1...n-due-to-gravity-at-height-h-with-derivation/

They prove the formula for acceleration due to gravity at height h, which is: g1 = g (1 – 2h/R).

There are similar articles online.

When they go through the last steps, it shows something like this:

g1/g = R2 /(R+h)2

= 1/(1 + h/R)2 = (1 + h/R)-2 = (1 – 2h/R)

But I don't understand, how does one move from R^2 /(R+h)^2 to 1/(1 + h/R)^2 = (1 + h/R)^-2 and then to (1 – 2h/R)

Could someone explain what's happening there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first step is simply to divide both numerator and denominator by R^2. In the second step, they have assumed that h<<R, so h/R <<1. You can then do a Taylor series expansion and keep only the first term in h/R.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Karagoz and berkeman
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top