edward
- 73
- 165
The discussion revolves around the "Bridge to Nowhere" at Stony Brook, exploring its origins, interpretations, and related architectural oddities. Participants share anecdotes, opinions on design failures, and reflections on art in architecture, with a focus on humor and critique.
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the nature of the bridge and similar designs. While some view them as artistic expressions, others see them as failures or absurdities. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the artistic merit and intent behind these structures.
Participants acknowledge that many of the designs discussed may lack complete information or context, leading to speculation about their purpose and execution. There is also mention of varying standards in architectural practices across different regions and institutions.
This discussion may be of interest to those studying architecture, design, or urban planning, as well as individuals intrigued by the intersection of art and functionality in public spaces.
I'm guessing the escalators.mgb_phys said:All of these are true except one ( it's an art projectby Frank Kunert)
No.OAQfirst said:I'm guessing the escalators.
edward said:
So you only have the one _ _ _ _ _ ?rootX said:I found this the most stupid one.
rootX said:http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/5904/image012noblueprintslj7.jpg
Siamese twins have two.mgb_phys said:So you only have the one _ _ _ _ _ ?
mgb_phys said:No.
Then it got surreal. We taped up the door and put big warning notices not to open it, the health and safety people came and told us off for blocking a fire exit. We pointed out that it opened onto a 15ft drop, but that wasn't their problem - the outside of the building wasn't their responsibility!
Most of the others I suspect were done on purpose, are incomplete, or we don't have all the info. The balcony with no window is probably a purposeful architectural feature and in the train tracks one, the train tracks are probably abandoned.mgb_phys said:So you only have the one _ _ _ _ _ ?
The site mentioned that a lot of the buildings ones were from the former Soviet bloc. I suppose a combination of school janitor level of customer service and don't question authority gets you that.russ_watters said:Most of the others I suspect were done on purpose, are incomplete, or we don't have all the info.
Thats the art work - Frank Kunertin the train tracks one, the train tracks are probably abandoned.
mgb_phys said:I suppose a combination of school janitor level of customer service and don't question authority gets you that.
I need to become an artist - it is amazing what passes for art these days.mgb_phys said:The site mentioned that a lot of the buildings ones were from the former Soviet bloc. I suppose a combination of school janitor level of customer service and don't question authority gets you that.
Anybody who has dealt with the buildings/maintenance dept at any university will appreciate those 'designs'.
Thats the art work - Frank Kunert
![]()
edward said:
Did you really look at his work? I think it definitely is (architectural) art. Or would you think the work that Escher made is not art either?russ_watters said:I need to become an artist - it is amazing what passes for art these days.
And Monique - that one is clever, and maybe interesting, but jeez - art? Really? I do that kind of thing all the time - I like to make my friends look like drunkards by photographing them with 2 ft tall "pints" of beer at the bar...
fuzzyfelt said:Great thread!
Photoshopped by Dutch architecture firm-
http://www.geekologie.com/2008/09/post_54.php
We have a ceiling on our speeds limits here, but also a floor. And if you're driving below the floor, you had better floor it, or you'll end up on your ceiling.BobG said:I like the loop. That would take care of the problem of slow drivers on the interstate.