Projectile motion of a thrown rock

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically the scenario of a hiker throwing a stone from a vertical cliff. The stone's initial velocity and the angle of projection are provided, along with the time it takes to hit the ground. The objective is to determine the height of the cliff.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the initial velocity into vertical and horizontal components. There is some confusion regarding the correct assignment of these components based on the angle of projection. Questions arise about the algebraic steps taken and the interpretation of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking algebra and trigonometric calculations. There is acknowledgment of different interpretations of the angle in relation to the cliff face. Multiple approaches to solving for the height of the cliff are being explored, with some participants sharing their own calculations and results.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the absence of air resistance and the specific time duration for the stone's flight. The original poster's goal is explicitly stated as finding the height of the cliff, which is central to the discussion.

Mdhiggenz
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A hiker throws a stone from the upper edge of a vertical cliff. The stone ' s initial velocity is 25.0 m/s directed at 40.0 degrees with the face of the cliff, as shown in Fig. 3.1. The stone hits the ground 3.75 s after being thrown and feels no appreciable air resistance as it falls. the height of the cliff is closest to

Here is the link to the picture: http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8058/58525486.jpg

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So what I first did was break the velocity into its vertical and horizontal components,

25.0sin40=16.06m/s(y0)

25.0cos40=19.15m/s(x0)

We know the time it takes to hit the gound is 3.75 seconds

I got its Vy( final velocity) by using the following equation vy=vosina-gt

vy=16.0sin40-9.8(3.75s)
=-26.46m/s

Here is where I start getting lost, I wanted to solve for deltay using the following formula;

vf^2=vi^2+2aDeltay

(-24.46)^2-(16.06)^2/2(-9.8).. and I got some funky answer, the answer to the problem is 141.

Can someone walk me through how to get that answer, thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well to start off 25sin40 is the x component of the velocity, not the y, assuming theta is the angle between the vertical cliff face and the direction the stone was thrown, although I could just be reading it wrong, the picture is open to interpretation...

Your kinematics equations are fine, it looks like a simple error in your algebra as long as the above error is irrelevant.

Additionally, what are you solving for?
 
Sorry I edited it, we are solving for the height of the cliff.
 
Mdhiggenz said:
Sorry I edited it, we are solving for the height of the cliff.

Check your algebra, and trig. Again, I don't think your angle is in the right spot. I solved it and got the correct answer.

Your kinematics equations themselves are fine.
 
I tried 25cos40=v0y=19.15

y=19.15(3.75)-1/2(-9.8)(3.75)^2=141!

Thank you!

Can You walk me through your thought process when you were solving this problem?
 
Mdhiggenz said:
I tried 25cos40=v0y=19.15

y=19.15(3.75)-1/2(-9.8)(3.75)^2=141!

Thank you!

Can You walk me through your thought process when you were solving this problem?

Sure :)

Ok so when I see a kinematics equation the first thing I do is resolve it into components, just as you did. I find that

v0x = 25sin40
v0y = 25cos40

Since we're concerned only with the height of the cliff, and we know the time it takes for it to fall, it becomes quite simple. You can solve one of two ways:

y = y0 + v0yt + .5at2

or solve for the final velocity in the y direction, and then use the time independent kinematics equation (thats the way we both did it, it just occurred to me that the way above works as well, and in one less step!)

Then just solve for x (making sure that your x0 correctly represents the initial position.

Hope this helps! :)
 
Clear explanation, thank you!
 
No problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K