What's Wrong with My Eigenvector Calculation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=54215&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what's wrong with my work. I can't obtain the eigenvector provided in the model answer.

My work
attachment.php?attachmentid=54214&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg


Model Answer
attachment.php?attachmentid=54216&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IQM.jpg
    IQM.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 624
  • IQM1.jpg
    IQM1.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 1,107
  • IQM2.jpg
    IQM2.jpg
    14.4 KB · Views: 635
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is fine. Remember that an eigenvector is only unique up to a multiplicative constant. The eigenvector you found can be written
$$\left\lvert \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \right\rangle = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{bmatrix} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}\frac{1-i}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix}e^{-i\pi/4} \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}.$$ If you multiply that by ##e^{i\pi/8}## and ignore the normalization factor of ##1/\sqrt{2}##, you'll get the answer in the solution.
 
Oh! Thank you very much.
But why do we bother to have such a complicated eigenvector?
The one with (1-i)/2 and 1/(sqrt2) is much easier to find. Why do we need to change it to the form of exp?