What's Wrong with This Argument? Problem-Solving a Homework Statement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics homework problem involving the application of a horizontal force of 15 N on a 2 kg block, where the work done is stated as 20 J. The teacher's solution, derived from the formula W=F*d, suggests that the distance moved is always 4/3 m, which is incorrect. The fundamental flaw lies in the neglect of factors such as the object's weight, friction, and gravity, which significantly affect the actual distance moved under realistic conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle
  • Basic knowledge of forces, mass, and acceleration
  • Concepts of friction and gravitational force
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the work-energy theorem in classical mechanics
  • Study the effects of friction on motion and work
  • Learn about gravitational force calculations in different contexts
  • Explore real-world applications of force and distance in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of force, work, and motion in real-world scenarios.

Riddl3r
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Our teacher made an unconvincing argument based on this example:
If a horizontal force of 15 N were a applied to a 2 kg block, and the work done was 20 J, what distance did the object move?

2. The attempt at a solution
Using W=F*d the teacher solved this: 20 J=15 N*x -> x=4/3 m.
This implied that if I applied 15 N to an object of any mass and did 20 J of work, the distance I could move the object is always the same. There seems to be something fundamentally wrong with this statement. But I'm not seeing what it is, I know it's there - I'm think that somehow I need to do something with the weight of the object. I mean if it were to be realistic I would have to calculate friction and gravity too...

Can somebody please tell me what I missed out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K