Wheatstone Bridge Strain Gauge Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the use of a Wheatstone Bridge (WB) strain gauge configuration for measuring strain on a cantilevered beam. The user, Casey, encountered a negative strain measurement despite both strain gauges (RYellow and ROrange) being in tension. The negative value arises from the formula used: (R_strained - R_original) / (R_original * Gage Factor), where reversing R_original and R_strained yields a negative result. The conversation emphasizes understanding the measurement process and the significance of the half-bridge configuration in quantifying strain differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Wheatstone Bridge configurations
  • Knowledge of strain gauge principles and Gage Factor
  • Familiarity with resistance measurement and data acquisition systems
  • Basic grasp of electrical circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Wheatstone Bridge theory and applications
  • Learn about strain gauge calibration techniques
  • Explore data acquisition systems for strain measurement
  • Study the effects of different strain gauge configurations on measurement accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physics students, and researchers involved in mechanical testing and strain measurement, particularly those working with Wheatstone Bridge configurations and strain gauges.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I recently did a bending lab with a WB Strain Gauge in a bunch of different configurations.

One measurement in particular is bothering me. Referring to the figure below, there are four strain gauges, Yellow, Orange, Black and Red mounted to a cantilevered beam with an applied loading 'P.'

I had the data acquisition system output a measurement for a Half-Bridge configuration in which R1 = RYellow and R2 = ROrange

We can see from the figure that both of the gauges are in tension. So why is the strain measurement that I got negative? It is effectively taking the strain measured from the yellow gauge and subtracting it from the strain ,measured from the orange gauge. Why does it do that? What exactly is this quantifying?
bridge.jpg


Thanks,
Casey

Also: I thought maybe I screwed this up, but the Lab Assistant had all of the 'approximate expected strains' and mine matched up pretty well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.
 
Harry Hazard said:
Since you said your strain "number" is correct and your "sign" is wrong, my first guess is to check your resistance to strain formula.

Classically, this would be (R_strained-R_original)/(R/original*Gage Factor).

Reversing the R_original and R_strained in the numerator would produce the same result, only negative.

Hey there :smile: Thanks for having a look, but just to clarify:

I never said that my sign was wrong. I just don't understand what is being measured here. Why does the half bridge take one measurement and subtract it from the other? What does that get me?

Thanks!
 
Oops! I misread that. :D

You measure the voltage between two opposite points, let's say "North" and "South" if your bridge has the diamond configuration. And you apply a voltage from "West" to "East". On the South bridge, you have two known resistors. On the North, you have one known resistor and one unknown resistor(the strain gage). You can solve for the unknown resistor using the known resistors and voltages. And at this point, once I get my scanner working, I'll scan in my notes on it. lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K