When can the Lagrangian be used

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dsdsuster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lagrangian can be effectively used in scenarios involving constraint forces that do no work, as demonstrated in the case of a bead of mass m on a frictionless rod spinning with constant angular velocity ω. The Lagrangian is formulated as T - U, where T represents kinetic energy and U represents potential energy. Despite the presence of a normal force from the rod, which aligns with the bead's instantaneous velocity, the analysis confirms that centripetal forces do not perform work. Thus, the Lagrangian framework remains valid even when the radius of the bead's circular path changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Knowledge of constraint forces in physics
  • Basic principles of rotational motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian equations of motion
  • Explore examples of constraint forces and their implications in Lagrangian mechanics
  • Investigate the role of centripetal forces in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the application of Lagrangian mechanics in non-conservative systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in advanced applications of Lagrangian mechanics.

dsdsuster
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hello. I have a question about when the Lagrangian can be used. In the textbook we are using it is shown that for constraint forces which do no work, the Lagrangian is of the form T-U. In this question though, it seems like rod would provide a normal force that is in the same direction as the bead's instantaneous velocity at all times.

A bead of mass m is threaded on a frictionless, straight rod which lies in a
horizontal (x-y so no change in gravitational potential energy of the bead) plane and is forced to spin with constant angular velocity ω about a vertical axis through the midpoint of the rod.

Writing out the Lagrangian equations of motion, I get the same result as if the bead were always subject to a radial centripetal force mrw^2. I would basically like to know why the Lagrangian can be used in this case, when the constraining force seems to do work.

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Centripetal forces do no work.
 
The radius of the circular path the bead is taking is changing though. Doesn't this imply work is being done?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K