Insights When Discussing the Twin Paradox: Read This First

Click For Summary
The article serves as a guide for initiating discussions about the twin paradox on PhysicsForums, emphasizing the importance of reviewing existing threads to avoid redundancy. It highlights that many previous discussions cover similar concepts, and reading this article can help frame new questions effectively. Users are encouraged to consult an established article from the Usenet Physics FAQ before posting. The goal is to enhance the quality of discussions and responses on the topic. Engaging with this foundational material is essential for meaningful contributions to the conversation.
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
Messages
49,276
Reaction score
25,324
This article is intended for anyone who wants to start a thread here at PhysicsForums on the twin paradox. There are already many, many threads here on this topic, and they tend to cover the same ground over and over again, so it seems useful to put a description of that ground into an article that everyone can read before starting yet another thread. If you are in that category, and what is here answers your question, great! But even if it doesn’t, hopefully, this article will help you to frame whatever questions you still have after reading it, in a way that will help you to get better responses without repeating things that have already been said here many times before.
Having said that, the first thing we will do is shamelessly borrow an already existing article on the twin paradox, the one that is part of the Usenet Physics FAQ. Before you go any further, please read it, all pages. It’s not long. Here it is...

Continue reading...
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Karin Helene Elise, Zeal Faust, berkeman and 9 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Great
 
Moderator's note: An off topic subthread has been deleted. Please keep discussion on topic. Thanks!
 

Thread 'Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem'

I've been thinking some more about the Hawking - Penrose Singularity theorem and was wondering if you could help me gain a better understanding of the assumptions they made when they wrote it, in 1970. In Hawking's book, A Brief History of Time (chapter 3, page 25) he writes.... In 1965 I read about Penrose’s theorem that any body undergoing gravitational collapse must eventually form a singularity. I soon realized that if one reversed the direction of time in Penrose’s theorem, so that...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Understanding Spacetime simultaneity in twin paradox scenarios
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Insights Learning Twin Paradox for Freely-Falling Observers
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
B A scenario to help understand the twin paradox in SR
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
B My paraphrased explanation of the Twin Paradox
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
I What happens when twins synchronize clocks and one teleports?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Is the Twins Paradox Equivalent to GPS Time Dilation?
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
B Understanding the Twin Paradox: Simplifying with a Clear Experiment
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
I Twin Paradox: Calculating Stan's Time Elapsed According to Moe
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
I Twin Paradox Explained: No Math Required
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
B Twins Paradox Thought Exp: What Happens When Reunited?
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K