When is arc length ≈ chord length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the approximation of arc length (SAB) and chord length (AB) in a circle of radius R, specifically under the condition that the angle theta is small. The relationship SAB = R*theta and AB = 2*R*sin(theta/2) is established, leading to the condition for a good approximation: when SAB/R < 2*Xcr, where Xcr is a critical angle for which sin(X) approximates X. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both relative and absolute errors in this approximation, particularly for angles less than 10 degrees.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic trigonometric functions, particularly sine.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of arc length and chord length in circles.
  • Knowledge of limits and approximations in calculus.
  • Ability to analyze relative and absolute errors in mathematical approximations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of sine functions and their approximations for small angles.
  • Study the relationship between arc length and chord length in circular geometry.
  • Explore the concept of relative vs. absolute error in mathematical contexts.
  • Investigate the implications of using Taylor series for approximating trigonometric functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying precalculus or calculus, mathematicians interested in geometric approximations, and educators looking to explain the concepts of arc and chord lengths effectively.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Maybe this is precalculus? Either way, here is a question that I am curious about. Take a circle of radius R and sweep out an arc length SAB with endpoints 'A' and 'B' over angle theta. For a short enough arc length, I believe that we could approximate SAB by the chord length AB.

I am trying quantify "when" the ratio SAB/R is such that the approximation is a good one. I guess a good start is to establish some relationships. From the picture below, we see that the arc length is given by SAB=R*theta and the chord length is given by AB = 2*R*sin(theta/2).

So I believe we should now ask when does R*theta ≈ 2*R*sin(theta/2).

I know from other problems we often employ the approximation that if an angle 'X' is "small enough", then sin(X)≈X. It looks like this would help here since if we let sin(theta/2) = theta/2, then the approximation above becomes an identity. I am just having trouble figuring out how to relate this all back to the ratio SAB/R ? What if we said that we already know that for some critical value of the angle X we can approximate sin(X) = X. We will call that "known" value Xcr. So if theta/2 < Xcr then SAB≈AB. So
\theta/2 &lt; X_{cr}\Rightarrow \theta &lt; 2*X_{cr} and from the arc length relationship SAB = r*theta we can assert that when S_{AB}/R &lt; 2*X_{cr}, the approximation is good.

Can someone let me know if they think my logic is flawed? I have never done something like this from scratch before :redface:

Thanks!

chord.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your argument looks like a typical reasonable heuristic one.


However, do note that you are paying attention to relative error. If x and sin(x) are "close", then relatively speaking, Rx and Rsin(x) are equally "close".

However, if absolute error matters, your condition on a good approximation will depend on both R and x.
 
Hurkyl said:
However, if absolute error matters, your condition on a good approximation will depend on both R and x.

Hi Hurkyl :smile: I am wondering, isn't this the same as saying that that my condition of a good approximation depends on how close the value of the ratio S/R is to 2*Xcr ? Seeing as the angle is given by S/R.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Generally, we assume sinx~x for x<10degrees. So maybe that would be of some help to you
 
Yes you can ! :)

but it all depends on how accurate you want to be and/or if you don't have an easy alternative.

*basically its a good approximation, you don't need to guess just crunch the numbers and check by how much percent sin(x) and x differ for a range of values.
 
Saladsamurai said:
Hi Hurkyl :smile: I am wondering, isn't this the same as saying that that my condition of a good approximation depends on how close the value of the ratio S/R is to 2*Xcr ?
Nope.

While the value SAB/R tells you everything about the relative error when approximating SAB with AB, it doesn't tell you anything about the absolute error.
 
Hurkyl said:
Nope.

While the value SAB/R tells you everything about the relative error when approximating SAB with AB, it doesn't tell you anything about the absolute error.

OK. So perhaps you are saying that for some fixed R, the choice of X will fix my absolute error? That is, if given the choice between 2 different values of X1 and X2, then the one that makes sin(X) closest to X is the one with the lowest absolute error.

Sorry, I am just trying to get a feel for what you are saying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K