MHB When the capacitor have 94% of its final voltage.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everybody,

Using the exact exponential treatment, find how much time (in s) is required to charge an initially uncharged 140 pF capacitor (C) through a 77.0 M[FONT=&quot]Ω resistor (R) to 94.0% of its final voltage ($\varepsilon$).

Work:
C=140 pF=1.4x10^-10
R=77.0 Mohm=7.7x10^5
$q(t)=C\varepsilon(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$ or $I(t)=\frac{\varepsilon}{R}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}$
RC=.000108

What am I missing?
.94*C or what is the battery?

Thanks
Carter Barker
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everybody,

Using the exact exponential treatment, find how much time (in s) is required to charge an initially uncharged 140 pF capacitor (C) through a 77.0 M resistor (R) to 94.0% of its final voltage ($\varepsilon$).

Work:
C=140 pF=1.4x10^-10
R=77.0 Mohm=7.7x10^5
$q(t)=C\varepsilon(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$ or $I(t)=\frac{\varepsilon}{R}e^{\frac{-t}{RC}}$
RC=.000108

What am I missing?
.94*C or what is the battery?

Thanks
Carter Barker

Hi Carter,

Note first that $77\,\text{M$\Omega$}$ is $77\times10^6 = 7.7\times10^7$.

The voltage has the form $V(t) = V_\infty(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})$, where $V_\infty$ is is the final voltage, corresponding to $t\to\infty$. $V(t)$ will be equal to $0.94V_\infty$ when $(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}}) = 0.94$.

You can easily compute the corresponding value of $t$ using logarithms.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top