Capacitor and Dependent Voltage Source

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a circuit involving a capacitor and a dependent voltage source, focusing on determining the expression for the output current ##i_o(t)## for ##t≥0^+##. Participants explore various equations and methods to solve the problem, including Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to incorporate the dependent source into their calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the initial voltage across the capacitor being 15 volts and the subsequent current through the capacitor being defined as ##C\frac{dV(t)}{dt}##.
  • Participants propose writing KVL equations for the circuit, with one participant deriving equations such as ##5i_0 + V - 15i_0 = 0## and ##V - 10i_0 = 0##.
  • There are suggestions to express the voltage across the capacitor as a function of the current and to set up a differential equation in terms of charge on the capacitor.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of reversing the direction of current and the polarity of the dependent source to avoid sign errors.
  • One participant suggests that the dependent voltage source can be treated as a resistor, which simplifies the analysis.
  • There is a mention of a specific solution for the current, ##i(t)=0.75e^{-25000t}##, and discussions about the correctness of this expression.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to handle the dependent source and whether it can be treated as a resistor. There is no consensus on the best approach to solve the problem, and multiple competing methods and interpretations are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of carefully considering polarities and the definitions of variables in their equations. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the behavior of the dependent source and its impact on the circuit analysis.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,205
Reaction score
7,687

Homework Statement


Select the correct expression for ##i_o(t)## for ##t≥0^+##.
Figure_P07.30.jpg

Homework Equations


##V(t) = V(∞)+[v(0)-v(∞)]e^{\frac{-(t-t_0}{\tau}}##
##i(t) = C\frac{dV(t)}{dt}##
##\tau = RC##

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a bit stuck on this problem. Specifically, I'm not sure how to deal with the dependent source.

At ##t=0##, the voltage of the capacitor should be 15 volts since the capacitor is directly in series with the voltage source with no branches leading off anywhere.

After ##t=0## the current through the capacitor would be ##C\frac{dV(t)}{dt}##, but I'm sure the dependent source changes things somehow. I'm just not sure how.
 

Attachments

  • Figure_P07.30.jpg
    Figure_P07.30.jpg
    5.4 KB · Views: 1,306
Physics news on Phys.org
Drakkith said:
At t=0t=0, the voltage of the capacitor should be 15 volts since the capacitor is directly in series with the voltage source with no branches leading off anywhere.
Correct.
Drakkith said:
After t=0t=0 the current through the capacitor would be CdV(t)dtC\frac{dV(t)}{dt}, but I'm sure the dependent source changes things somehow. I'm just not sure how.
Try writing the KVL loop equation for that right-hand loop after the switch changes, and then factor in the initial condition that you have.
 
berkeman said:
Try writing the KVL loop equation for that right-hand loop after the switch changes, and then factor in the initial condition that you have.

For my KVL loop I get ##5i_0 + V -15i_0 = 0##
## V-10i_0 = 0##
##V=10i_0##

After this I'm not sure what to do. I thought my capacitor voltage equation would be ##V(t) = 15e^{-3333t}## but using that doesn't lead me to a correct current expression.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drakkith said:
For my KVL loop I get ##5i_0 + V -15i_0 = 0##
## V-10i_0 = 0##
##V=10_i0##

After this I'm not sure what to do. I thought my capacitor voltage equation would be ##V(t) = 15e^{-3333t}## but using that doesn't lead me to a correct current expression.
To get the voltage across the capacitor, you need to use the differential equation version. There may be a better way to approach it, but I'd start out my try adding up the voltage drops across the components in that loop and setting the sum equal to zero. what is the voltage drop across the capacitor as a function of the current?
 
berkeman said:
To get the voltage across the capacitor, you need to use the differential equation version. There may be a better way to approach it, but I'd start out my try adding up the voltage drops across the components in that loop and setting the sum equal to zero.

Didn't I just do that?

berkeman said:
what is the voltage drop across the capacitor as a function of the current?

In general, or for this problem?
 
Drakkith said:
In general, or for this problem?
In general, as a function of time.

Or, set up a DE in terms of charge on the capacitor.
 
cnh1995 said:
In general, as a function of time.
It should be ##V(t) = \frac{1}{c}\int i(t)dt##
 
Drakkith said:
It should be ##V(t) = \frac{1}{c}\int i(t)dt##
Yes, so what is i(t)?
 
Drakkith said:
For my KVL loop I get ##5i_0 + V -15i_0 = 0##
## V-10i_0 = 0##
##V=10_i0##

After this I'm not sure what to do. I thought my capacitor voltage equation would be ##V(t) = 15e^{-3333t}## but using that doesn't lead me to a correct current expression.
You have arrived at the correct expression for V.
What is i0(t) in terms of charge on the capacitor? What is voltage V in terms charge on the capacitor?
 
  • #10
Drakkith said:
I'm a bit stuck on this problem. Specifically, I'm not sure how to deal with the dependent source.
I'm confused, too. You show a voltage arrow across the capacitor and the arrow appears to be labelled ##i_0##. Is that what you see in your textbook?
 
  • #11
cnh1995 said:
Yes, so what is i(t)?
It should be just what I put in my original post: ##i(t) = c\frac{dv}{dt}##
cnh1995 said:
You have arrived at the correct expression for V.
What is i0(t) in terms of charge on the capacitor? What is voltage V in terms charge on the capacitor?

##i(t) = \frac{dQ(t)}{dt}##
##V = \frac{Q}{C}##

NascentOxygen said:
I'm confused, too. You show a voltage arrow across the capacitor and the arrow appears to be labelled ##i_0##. Is that what you see in your textbook?
Yes, this picture is directly from the book. ##i_0## is the current through the capacitor.
 
  • #12
Your equations for i(t) and V(t) in terms of charge are correct.
Now substitute these values in the pink equation in #9 and solve the DE (for Q(t)).
 
  • #13
@Drakkith, I just realized that I wasn't careful with the polarities.
To avoid any sign errors, I would reverse the the direction of Io (since the capacitor is discharging), call it I1 (So I1= -Io) and reverse the dependent source polarity (it will now be 5I1).

Now you can see the dependent source is not really a source but is actually a 5 ohm resistor in disguise.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
cnh1995 said:
Your equations for i(t) and V(t) in terms of charge are correct.
Now substitute these values in the pink equation in #9 and solve the DE (for Q(t)).

Solving for the DE I get: ##i_0(t) = 50,000Ae^{50,000Q(t)}##
##Q(0) = CV(0) = 2*10^{-6}(15) = 3*10^{-5}##
So ##i_0(0) = 50,000Ae^{1.5}##

To find A, I need ##i_0(0)##.
Doing a KVL loop: ##15-5i_0+15i_0=0##
##i_0 = -1.5A##

Plugging that in:
##-1.5=50,000Ae^{1.5}##
That would make ##A = -6.69*10^{-6}##
and:
##i(t) = -0.335e^{50,000Q(t)}##

Well, that's closer to one of the possible answers. The exponential matches some of them, but the constant doesn't.

To solve my DE, I did:
##V-10i_0 = 0##
##\frac{Q}{C}-10\frac{dQ}{dt} = 0##
##-10\frac{dQ}{dt}+\frac{Q}{C} = 0##
##\frac{dQ}{dt}-\frac{Q}{10C}=0##
##\frac{dQ}{dt}-50,000Q=0##
My integrating factor is: ##exp(\int -50,000 dQ)=e^{-50,000Q}##
Multiplying the equation by the IF:
##e^{-50,000Q}\frac{dQ}{dt} -50,000e^{-50,000Q}Q = 0##
That's just:
##\frac{d({e^{-50,000Q}Q})}{dt} = 0##
Integrating and moving the constant over:
##e^{-50,000Q}Q = A##
##Q = \frac{A}{e^{-50,000Q}}##
##Q = Ae^{50,000Q}##

Since ##i_0 = \frac{dQ}{dt}##
##i_0 = 50,000Ae^{50,000Q}##
 
  • #15
Is the given answer I(t)=0.75e-25000t?
 
  • #16
cnh1995 said:
Is the given answer I(t)=0.75e-25000t?

Apparently it's ##-0.75e^{25,000t}##
 
  • #17
Drakkith said:
Apparently it's ##-0.75e^{25,000t}##
Yes, because I'd reversed Io in #13.

Your equation for i(t) in #14 is dimensionally incorrect (and you don't need that much math either).

Use the steps in #13. The fact that the dependent voltage source is actually just a 5 ohm resistor makes the solution a lot simpler.
 
  • #18
cnh1995 said:
Use the steps in #13.

Do you mean treat the dependent source as a resistor and solve the problem?

cnh1995 said:
The fact that the dependent voltage source is actually just a 5 ohm resistor makes the solution a lot simpler.

Hmm. Am I supposed to be able to recognize that this is a resistor in order to solve this?
 
  • #19
Drakkith said:
Do you mean treat the dependent source as a resistor and solve the problem?
Yes.
Drakkith said:
Hmm. Am I supposed to be able to recognize that this is a resistor in order to solve this?
Even if you don't recognize that, you'll realize it when you write the KVL equation. But since the capacitor is discharging, it would be better if you assumed a current I1 (anticlockwise) such that I1= -Io. Remember that you'll have to reverse the dependent source's polarity as well.

Now you'll have current I1 flowing throgh the dependent source from its positive terminal to negative terminal and this voltage "drop" is 5I1. Doesn't this suggest that the dependent source is acting as a 5 ohm resistor here?
 
  • #20
Alright, treating the dependent source as a resistor and using ##i_1 = -i_0 ##:
##V(t)=15e^{-25000t}##
##i_1(t)=-c\frac{dV}{dt}=-2*10^{-6}(-25000)(15)e^{-25000t}=0.75e^{-25000t}##

cnh1995 said:
Now you'll have current I1 flowing throgh the dependent source from its positive terminal to negative terminal and this voltage "drop" is 5I1. Doesn't this suggest that the dependent source is acting as a 5 ohm resistor here?

I suppose so. I'm not sure I would have recognized that had you not mentioned it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like this is only true as long as the polarity of the source is such that the current enters the positive terminal, correct? If the source voltage was proportional to ##-5i_0## then we wouldn't be able to treat this as a resistor.
 
  • #21
Drakkith said:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like this is only true as long as the polarity of the source is such that the current enters the positive terminal, correct? If the source voltage was proportional to −5i0−5i0-5i_0 then we wouldn't be able to treat this as a resistor.
That's right.
 
  • #22
Roger. Thanks all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K