When the Schwarzschild radius is inside the star

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Schwarzschild radius being located inside a non-rotating star. Participants explore the validity of the Schwarzschild metric in this context, particularly focusing on the conditions under which it applies and the nature of the metric inside a spherically symmetric body.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the Schwarzschild metric is only valid in empty space and suggest that if the Schwarzschild radius is less than the radius of the body, the metric applies for regions outside the body.
  • There is a suggestion that the metric breaks down inside the star, raising questions about what happens to the metric in that region.
  • Participants mention that a different metric exists for the interior of a spherically symmetric body, which matches the Schwarzschild metric at the boundary, though the exact name of this metric is not recalled by all participants.
  • Some contributions discuss the need to solve the Einstein Field Equations (EFEs) for a non-vanishing Stress-Energy tensor to describe the interior of a star, possibly under spherical symmetry conditions.
  • The Tolman-Oppenheimer equation is referenced as relevant to the discussion, with some uncertainty about the existence of an analytic solution for the interior metric.
  • There is mention of two distinct interpretations of the term "interior Schwarzschild solution," one relating to the spacetime inside a black hole and the other to a non-singular solution for a constant density star.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the Schwarzschild metric inside a star, with some asserting it breaks down while others propose alternative metrics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of the interior metric and the existence of analytic solutions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential dependence on definitions of metrics and the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps related to the interior solutions of stars.

lavinia
Science Advisor
Messages
3,385
Reaction score
760
What happens to the Schwarzschild metric for an isolated non-rotating body when the horizon radius is inside the body? As I remember from classical physics all of the gravitational pull on an object inside a shell cancels out so it would seem that the horizon radius can not include any mass outside of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi lavinia! :smile:
lavinia said:
What happens to the Schwarzschild metric for an isolated non-rotating body when the horizon radius is inside the body? As I remember from classical physics all of the gravitational pull on an object inside a shell cancels out so it would seem that the horizon radius can not include any mass outside of it.

yes :smile:

another way of looking at it is that the Schwarzschild metric is only valid in empty space …

find the Schwarzschild radius from the actual mass, then if that is less than the radius R of the body, the Schwarzschild metric is valid for r > R :wink:

(eg the metric in the empty space outside the Sun is the Schwarzschild metric for a black hole with the same mass as the Sun)
 
When the Schwarzschild radius is inside the star.
Just to make sure it's clear, that is always the case for a star.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi lavinia! :smile:


yes :smile:

another way of looking at it is that the Schwarzschild metric is only valid in empty space …

find the Schwarzschild radius from the actual mass, then if that is less than the radius R of the body, the Schwarzschild metric is valid for r > R :wink:

(eg the metric in the empty space outside the Sun is the Schwarzschild metric for a black hole with the same mass as the Sun)

Thanks Tiny-tim! So the metric breaks down inside the star. That makes sense. What happens to the metric?
 
There is a different metric for inside of a spherically symmetric body. It matches Swarzschild metric at the boundary (surface). There's a name for it, but I don't recall what that name is. I'm also not sure if there is an analytic solution for it, or if it's purely numerical.
 
lavinia said:
Thanks Tiny-tim! So the metric breaks down inside the star. That makes sense. What happens to the metric?

It just isn't valid in the interior of the star. If R > 2M and you come to r = R you won't really see anything happen in the metric but since this metric is a vacuum solution it can only be allowed to describe anything for r > R. If you want to describe the interior you will have to solve the EFEs, possibly with spherical symmetry conditions applied, for a non - vanishing Stress - Energy tensor (such as that of a static fluid to get the solution for the interior of a static, spherically symmetric star).
 
K^2 said:
There is a different metric for inside of a spherically symmetric body. It matches Swarzschild metric at the boundary (surface). There's a name for it, but I don't recall what that name is. I'm also not sure if there is an analytic solution for it, or if it's purely numerical.

Oh the Tolman - Oppenheimer equation? - [tex]\frac{\mathrm{d} p}{\mathrm{d} r} = \frac{{(\rho + p)(m(r) + 4\pi r^{3}p)}}{r(r - 2m(r))}[/tex] where [itex]m(r) = \frac{1}{2}r(1 - e^{-2\Lambda })[/itex] and you have the equation [tex](\rho + p)\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi }{\mathrm{d} r} = \frac{\mathrm{d} p}{\mathrm{d} r}[/tex] to get the metric. I also believe there is no analytic solution for it but I could be wrong.
 
WannabeNewton said:
Oh the Tolman - Oppenheimer equation? - [tex]\frac{\mathrm{d} p}{\mathrm{d} r} = \frac{{(\rho + p)(m(r) + 4\pi r^{3}p)}}{r(r - 2m(r))}[/tex] where [itex]m(r) = \frac{1}{2}r(1 - e^{-2\Lambda })[/itex] and you have the equation [tex](\rho + p)\frac{\mathrm{d} \Phi }{\mathrm{d} r} = \frac{\mathrm{d} p}{\mathrm{d} r}[/tex] to get the metric. I also believe there is no analytic solution for it but I could be wrong.

An equation of state [itex]p = p \left(\rho \right)[/itex] also is needed. For realistic models (eauations of state), this is done numerically, but Schwarzschild solved Einstein's equation analytically for a constant-density spherical star, with result
[tex] g=\left( \frac{3}{2}\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{R}}-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{1-\frac{2Mr^{2}}{R^{3}}}\right) ^{2}dt^{2}-\left( 1-\frac{2Mr^{2}}{R^{3}}\right) ^{-1}dr^{2}-r^{2}\left( d\theta ^{2}+\sin ^{2}\theta d\phi ^{2}\right).[/tex]

Unfortunately, the term "interior Schwarzschild solution" can refer to either of two very different metrics (solutions to Einstein's equation):

1) spacetime inside the event horizon of the Schwarzschild black hole solution, where there "is a singularity";

2) the non-singular solution inside a spherically symmetric, constant density massive object.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K