When to use exponents or multiply by constants in the rate law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of stoichiometric coefficients in rate laws, specifically how they influence the concentration terms in chemical kinetics. It is established that the concentration of reactants is raised to the power of their stoichiometric coefficients, while the internal structure of the molecules is irrelevant for single-step kinetics. The rate of reaction is expressed as ##k_3[H_2][I]^2##, indicating that a stoichiometric coefficient of two not only affects the exponent but also the rate at which reactants are consumed. The conversation emphasizes that while it is possible to calculate reaction rates without directly doubling them, the stoichiometric coefficients must be incorporated at some stage in the analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chemical kinetics and rate laws
  • Familiarity with stoichiometric coefficients in chemical reactions
  • Knowledge of reaction quotients and their definitions
  • Basic grasp of molecular structure and its implications in kinetics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of rate laws from stoichiometric coefficients
  • Explore the concept of reaction mechanisms and their impact on kinetics
  • Learn about the role of reaction quotients in equilibrium and kinetics
  • Investigate advanced topics in chemical kinetics, such as multi-step reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in chemical kinetics, and professionals involved in reaction mechanism analysis will benefit from this discussion.

adf89812
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
When to Multiply by Constants and do exponentiation in rate law equation ?
1721817595221.png
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You raise concentration to the power given by the stoichiometric coefficient, internal structure of the molecule (amount of atoms of different elements) doesn't matter (well, it can matter for the mechanism, but for a single step kinetics these are just black boxes doing some magic).

This is not different from the way reaction quotient is defined.
 
Borek said:
You raise concentration to the power given by the stoichiometric coefficient, internal structure of the molecule (amount of atoms of different elements) doesn't matter (well, it can matter for the mechanism, but for a single step kinetics these are just black boxes doing some magic).

This is not different from the way reaction quotient is defined.
where does the doubling in the
1721818519890.png
come from?
 
Rate of the reaction is ##k_3[H_2][ I]^2## but because of the stoichiometry I is consumed twice as fast.
 
Borek said:
Rate of the reaction is ##k_3[H_2][ I]^2## but because of the stoichiometry I is consumed twice as fast.
The stoichiometry coefficient of two means both double the speed and square the exponent on the concentration term always?
 
adf89812 said:
The stoichiometry coefficient of two means both double the speed and square the exponent on the concentration term always?
the stoichiometry coefficient on the reactant side of the decomposition has two effects always?
 
Many ways to skin that cat. In general it is perfectly possible to do the calculations without doubling the rate, but this stoichiometry coefficient needs to be used at some point.
 
Borek said:
Many ways to skin that cat. In general it is perfectly possible to do the calculations without doubling the rate, but this stoichiometry coefficient needs to be used at some point.
If there were homonuclear triatomic molecules, would that mean cubed the corresponding concentration but don't multiple the rate by three unless the stoichiometry means it's concentration is three times that of the others?
 
adf89812 said:
If there were homonuclear triatomic molecules, would that mean cubed the corresponding concentration

Why? I already told you whatever is inside the molecule doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: adf89812

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
744
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K