When to use 'ln' in integration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaybay92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Ln
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the appropriate use of the natural logarithm in integration, particularly when dealing with polynomial denominators. It is established that using the natural logarithm for integrals like ∫1/(2x + 3) dx results in a straightforward solution of ln|2x + 3|/2, while attempting to apply it to ∫1/(x^2 + 2x + 5) dx leads to complications requiring advanced differentiation techniques. The recommended approach for the latter is to complete the square and utilize the substitution method to transform the integral into a more manageable form, ultimately leading to the arctangent function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic integration techniques
  • Familiarity with the natural logarithm and its properties
  • Knowledge of differentiation rules, including the chain rule
  • Experience with completing the square in quadratic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of completing the square for quadratic functions
  • Learn about the substitution method in integration
  • Explore the properties and applications of the arctangent function
  • Review advanced differentiation techniques, including the quotient and product rules
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integration techniques involving logarithmic and polynomial functions.

Shaybay92
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
I get confused when it is 'ok' to use the natural logarithm when integrating a function. As soon as I see a denominator, I am always tempted to simply go 'ln(denominator)/d denominator)' but this is clearly wrong...

Is it wrong in situations where you have a polynomial denominator? For example

Integral 1/(x^2 + 2x + 5) dx... would this be ln(x^2 + 2x + 5) / 2x + 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can always check it by differentiating your anti-derivative and checking if you get the integrand back.
When you have something like
\int \frac{1}{2x + 3} \, dx
and you "guess"
\frac{\ln |2x + 3|}{2}
you can differentiate and see that it nicely works out (you need the chain rule, which gives a factor of 2 cancelling the denominator).

However, if you try that for
\frac{\ln(x^2 + 2x + 5)}{2x + 2}
you have to use a more complicated rule (e.g. quotient or product + chain rule) to differentiate, you don't just get
\frac{1}{x^2 + 2x + 5} \frac{2x + 2}{2x + 2}
but it is followed by "+ ... something you don't want ... "

So in this case you need to come up with something better. For example, in this quadratic function, you can try "completing the square": if you write
\frac{1}{x^2 + 2x + 5} = \frac{1}{(x + a)^2 + b}
you can substitute u = (x + a) / \sqrt{b} and use that
\int \frac{1}{1 + u^2} \, du = \operatorname{arctan}(u)
 
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K