MHB When Will the Object Be 15 Meters Above the Ground?

Click For Summary
An object propelled vertically upward with an initial velocity of 20 meters per second follows the equation s = -4.9t^2 + 20t. To determine when it reaches 15 meters above the ground, the equation simplifies to 4.9t^2 - 20t + 15 = 0, yielding two solutions: approximately 0.99 seconds while ascending and 3.09 seconds while descending. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for the gravitational acceleration, which is approximately 9.81 m/s². The calculations demonstrate the object's trajectory and the significance of quadratic equations in motion analysis. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately predicting the object's behavior in vertical motion scenarios.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{1.2.1}$
An object is propelled vertically upward with an initial velocity of 20 meters per second.
The distance s (in meters) of the object from the ground after t seconds is
$s=-4.9t^2+20t$
(a) When will the object be 15 meters above the ground?
$15=-4.9t^2+20 \implies -4.9t^2 =-5$
ok there is no term b so decided not to use quadratic formula
so far...:unsure:
$49t^2=50$

(b) When will it strike the ground?
(c) Will the object reach a height of 100 meters
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\tiny{1.2.1}$
An object is propelled vertically upward with an initial velocity of 20 meters per second.
The distance s (in meters) of the object from the ground after t seconds is
$s=-4.9t^2+20t$
(a) When will the object be 15 meters above the ground?
$15=-4.9t^2+20 \implies -4.9t^2 =-5$
ok there is no term b so decided not to use quadratic formula
You dropped the t on the 20t term in going from [math]s = -4.9t^2 + 20t[/math] to [math]15 = -4.9t^2 + 20t[/math].

-Dan
 
.
 
Last edited:
topsquark said:
You dropped the t on the 20t term in going from [math]s = -4.9t^2 + 20t[/math] to [math]15 = -4.9t^2 + 20t[/math].

-Dan

$15 = -4.9t^2 + 20t
\implies 4.9t^2-20t+15=0
\implies 49t^2-200t+150=0$
kinda hefty for a quadratic equation so went to W|A
$t\approx 3.0914s$ probably this since it is going up
$t\approx 0.99024s $

it was tempting to just round off the 4.9 but think this how fast things fall
 
karush said:
$15 = -4.9t^2 + 20t
\implies 4.9t^2-20t+15=0
\implies 49t^2-200t+150=0$
kinda hefty for a quadratic equation so went to W|A
$t\approx 3.0914s$ probably this since it is going up
$t\approx 0.99024s $

it was tempting to just round off the 4.9 but think this how fast things fall
Mostly a good job. On the way up it passes 15 m at t = 0.099024 s. g is the acceleration due to gravity so it's how fast it is changing how fast it is falling. (Just call it an acceleration.. it's easier!)

Technically g is about 9.81 m/s^2 but the number locally is slightly different everywhere so it changes a bit. 9.8 m/s^2 is good enough.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K