When Will the Thrown Ball Reach the Ground?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball thrown directly downward with an initial speed from a certain height, and participants are discussing the time it takes for the ball to reach the ground using kinematic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of kinematic equations, particularly focusing on the quadratic formula to solve for time. There are attempts to clarify the signs and values used in calculations, with some participants questioning their own methods and results.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the application of the quadratic formula and the correct handling of signs in calculations. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the results, with one participant eventually arriving at a solution after addressing previous mistakes.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of the quadratic formula and the setup of the problem, with participants expressing uncertainty about their calculations and results.

veloix
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/
A ball is thrown directly downward, with an initial speed of 7.15 m/s, from a height of 31.0 m. After what time interval does the ball strike the ground?



Homework Equations


All the kinematics equations dealing with velocity and height and accelration. need to solve for time.



The Attempt at a Solution


I tried this one couple of times. The first thing I did was use the equation Yf=Yi+Viyt+1/2(a)t^2.

I chose the top to be positive.
0= 31.0m+ 7.15 m/s(t)+1/2(-9.80)t^2
I saw that this look like a qudratic equation so i work it out
ax+bx+cx
-7.15 m/s +/-[(-7.15-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
it came out to be
-7.15+7.53 = 0.38
-7.15-7.53= -14.68
i think I am not doing something right, need some help with this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't personally check it, but it seems fine. The ball would hit the ground within a couple seconds or so (approx sqrt(6)) if you just dropped it, so if you throw it down it will be even quicker, like the half a second you got.
 
Viy = -7.15m/s since it is thrown downward.
 
oh ok i going compute this out then ty.
 
hmm its still not comeing out right i check my work but i keep getting the wrong anwser. I don't know what else i can do.
 
veloix said:
hmm its still not comeing out right i check my work but i keep getting the wrong anwser. I don't know what else i can do.

What time do you get?
 
when i caluclated everything t came out to be 15.34 if I chose the positve and -1.04 with the negative.
 
veloix said:
when i caluclated everything t came out to be 15.34 if I chose the positve and -1.04 with the negative.

can you show your calculations?
 
0= 31.0m + (-7.15 m/s)t + 1/2(-9.80 m/s^2)t^2
X= -(-7.15)+/-[-7.15^2-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-51.12-(-608)/-9.80]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[557/-9.80]^2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-56.8]^1/2 hmm i made a mistake with my signs man thse quads are tough hehe. i guess the solutions i got before don't reall exsit because of the negative rooot. hmmmm
 
  • #10
veloix said:
0= 31.0m + (-7.15 m/s)t + 1/2(-9.80 m/s^2)t^2
X= -(-7.15)+/-[-7.15^2-4(-4.90)(31.0)/2(-4.90)]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-51.12-(-608)/-9.80]^1/2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[557/-9.80]^2
X=-(-7.15)+/-[-56.8]^1/2 hmm i made a mistake with my signs man thse quads are tough hehe. i guess the solutions i got before don't reall exsit because of the negative rooot. hmmmm

Hmmm... I don't think you're applying the quadratic equation properly. the /2a part doesn't go inside the square root... and you should have (-7.15)^2 = 51.12 not -7.15^2=-51.12
 
  • #11
wow i was messing that up all kinds of ways i finally got the right anwser. thanks a lot for your help you save me on endless path hehe. the right anwser was 1.89s using the positive side.
 
  • #12
veloix said:
wow i was messing that up all kinds of ways i finally got the right anwser. thanks a lot for your help you save me on endless path hehe. the right anwser was 1.89s using the positive side.

cool! no prob!
 
  • #13
http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/5994/freefallgn3.jpg

sometimes it helps to reduce error and make life easier to plug in the x = vi t + 1/2 at^2 formula into the quadratic equation first and simplify before plugging in the actual values... this approach makes life easier for some ppl
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K