Where am i going wrong? partial fraction question

  • Thread starter Thread starter braceman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Partial
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a partial fraction decomposition problem involving the expression \(\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)}\). The original poster (OP) is attempting to reconcile their solution with an answer provided by Wolfram, which indicates a discrepancy in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The OP describes their approach using the cover-up method for partial fractions but expresses confusion over the results. They question where their reasoning may have gone wrong.
  • Some participants suggest revisiting the setup of the problem, particularly the choice of values substituted into the equation.
  • There are discussions about the implications of setting \(s = 0\) and how it affects the calculations.
  • Another participant proposes a different method of factoring and rearranging the equation to clarify the decomposition process.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

There are indications that the OP may have misunderstood the application of the cover-up method and the importance of maintaining standard form in their calculations. The discussion also highlights potential algebraic errors in the OP's reasoning.

braceman
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Doing a homework question and I ran it through wolfram and I get a different answer to what I'm working it out as...and I can't see where I'm going wrong. Anyone able to give a pointer?

my equation is
[tex]\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)}[/tex]


Wolfram gives the answer as

[tex]\frac{1}{s}-\frac{1}{s+1.56006}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using partial fraction decomposition I get (using cover up) -

[tex]\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} = \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B}{0.641s+1}[/tex]

[tex]A = \frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} ~~~~~~ where~s~ = 0[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{0.641.0 +1}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{1}[/tex]

[tex]∴A=1[/tex]

[tex]B = \frac{1}{s}[/tex]

[tex](0=0.641s+1[/tex]

[tex]-1=0.641s[/tex]

[tex]s=\frac{-1}{0.641}[/tex]

[tex]s=-1.56)[/tex]

[tex]∴B=\frac{1}{s}[/tex]

[tex]∴B=\frac{1}{-1.56}[/tex]

[tex]∴B=-0.641[/tex]

[tex]Inserting~A~and~B~into~the~decomposition[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{s} + \frac{-0.641}{0.641s+1}[/tex]

which I get to be

[tex]\frac{1}{s} - \frac{1}{s+1}[/tex]

Where am I making my schoolboy error? It's my first go at partial fractions and my textbook aint exactly crammed with examples. Anyone able to point out if I've made a glaring error or just something stupid...any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might want to look again at setting s = 0. Given it's a factor of the denominator.
 
braceman said:

Homework Statement



Doing a homework question and I ran it through wolfram and I get a different answer to what I'm working it out as...and I can't see where I'm going wrong. Anyone able to give a pointer?

my equation is
[tex]\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)}[/tex]


Wolfram gives the answer as

[tex]\frac{1}{s}-\frac{1}{s+1.56006}[/tex]

Let's begin by factoring ##.641## out of the denominator:$$
\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)}=\frac 1 {.641}\cdot \frac 1 {s(s+\frac 1 {.641})}=
1.56\cdot \frac 1 {s(s+1.56)}=
\frac a {s(s+a)}$$where ##a=1.56##. You want the fraction in that form to do the "cover up" method, from which you get$$
\frac 1 s + \frac {-1}{s+a}$$which agrees with Wolfram. I suggest you take it from there.
 
braceman said:
[tex]\cdots + \frac{-0.641}{0.641s+1}[/tex]

which I get to be

[tex]\cdots - \frac{1}{s+1}[/tex]

Where am I making my schoolboy error?

There. If you wanted to divide the top and bottom by 0.641, you forgot one of the terms in the fractiom.

You might want to look again at setting s = 0. Given it's a factor of the denominator.
Ignore that. Maybe PeroK doesn't understand the "cover up rule".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
AlephZero said:
Ignore that. Maybe PeroK doesn't understand the "cover up rule".

If the cover up rule allows you to divide by 0 and then tweak the distributive law, then I certainly don't understand it.

[tex]A = \frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} ~~~~~~ where~s~ = 0[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{0.641.0 +1}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{1}[/tex]

That's simply two algebraic wrongs making a right!
 
If A/x+ B/(x- a)= C/(x(x- a))
Then multiplying by x(x- a) we have A(x- a)+ Bx= C.
There is now no denominator so we can, without difficulty, let x= 0 and x= a getting
x= 0, -aA= C so A= -C/a and
x= a, aB= C so B= C/a.

Notice that
[tex]\frac{(-C/a)}{x}+ \frac{C/a}{x- a}= \frac{(-(C/a)x+ C}{x(x- a)}+ \frac{(C/a)x}{x(x= a)}= \frac{C}{x(x- a)}[/tex]
as desired.
 
Thanks for the replies...I realized where I went wrong suddenly, ie- had to make it 'standard form' and needed a 1 on the numerator instead of the 0.641...so manipulated the equation and it all fell into place.

So once again, thankyou all for the help.
 
braceman said:

Homework Statement



Doing a homework question and I ran it through wolfram and I get a different answer to what I'm working it out as...and I can't see where I'm going wrong. Anyone able to give a pointer?

my equation is
[tex]\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)}[/tex]


Wolfram gives the answer as

[tex]\frac{1}{s}-\frac{1}{s+1.56006}[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using partial fraction decomposition I get (using cover up) -

[tex]\frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} = \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B}{0.641s+1}[/tex]

[tex]A = \frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} ~~~~~~ where~s~ = 0[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{0.641.0 +1}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{1}[/tex]

[tex]∴A=1[/tex]

[tex]B = \frac{1}{s}[/tex]

[tex](0=0.641s+1[/tex]

[tex]-1=0.641s[/tex]

[tex]s=\frac{-1}{0.641}[/tex]

[tex]s=-1.56)[/tex]

[tex]∴B=\frac{1}{s}[/tex]

[tex]∴B=\frac{1}{-1.56}[/tex]

[tex]∴B=-0.641[/tex]

[tex]Inserting~A~and~B~into~the~decomposition[/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{s} + \frac{-0.641}{0.641s+1}[/tex]

which I get to be

[tex]\frac{1}{s} - \frac{1}{s+1}[/tex]

Where am I making my schoolboy error? It's my first go at partial fractions and my textbook aint exactly crammed with examples. Anyone able to point out if I've made a glaring error or just something stupid...any help would be appreciated.

If you do it properly, it is more-or-less straightforward. You went at it the wrong way, so made it longer and more complicated than necessary.

Write
[tex]\frac{1}{s(1+as)} = \frac{A}{s} + \frac{B}{as+1}[/tex]
where ##A,B## are constants. Put the above over a common denominator:
[tex]\frac{A}{s} + \frac{B}{as+1} = \frac{A(as+1)+Bs}{s(as+1)}[/tex]
This supposed to equal ##1/[s(as+1)] ## for ALL ##s##, so the numerators much match exactly (because the denominators match). The numerator is ##A(as+1)+ Bs = (Aa+B)s + A##, so we need
[tex](Aa+B)s + A = 1[/tex]
for ALL ##s##. The polynomial ##P(s) = (Aa+B)s + A## must satisfy ##P(s) = 1## for all ##s##; that means its constant term must = 1 and the coefficient of ##s## must vanish, so ##A = 1## and ##Aa+B = 0##. In other words, we have
[tex]\frac{1}{s(1+as)}= \frac{1}{s} - \frac{a}{as+1}[/tex]
 
PeroK said:
If the cover up rule allows you to divide by 0 and then tweak the distributive law, then I certainly don't understand it.

[tex]A = \frac{1}{s(0.641s + 1)} ~~~~~~ \text{where }s~ = 0[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{0.641.0 +1}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{1}[/tex]

That's simply two algebraic wrongs making a right!
The OP made an algebra error, and the righthand side should have been
$$\frac{1}{0.641 s + 1}$$ which is defined for ##s=0##.

(Of course, to get to that point, you multiply the original equation by ##s## and therefore are assuming that ##s\ne 0##, but that's a minor complication.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K