Where am I going wrong with my Interval of Convergence calculations?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MacLaddy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Interval
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the interval of convergence and radius of convergence for power series, specifically using the ratio test. Participants share their calculations and results, expressing confusion and seeking clarification on discrepancies between their answers and those provided by an online class.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Mac, presents a power series and applies the ratio test, arriving at a limit of convergence and radius that contradicts the online class's results, leading to confusion.
  • Another participant attempts to apply the ratio test to a different series, initially arriving at an interval of convergence that differs from the expected answer, prompting further examination of their calculations.
  • Some participants suggest that the series may converge for all \(x\) by comparing it to a modified exponential series, but the reasoning is not universally accepted.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of taking limits and how they affect the radius of convergence, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their understanding of the concepts involved.
  • Participants express that they are missing steps in their reasoning and calculations, particularly in how to handle limits and absolute values in the context of convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct interval and radius of convergence for the series discussed. Multiple competing views and interpretations of the ratio test and its application remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding and calculations, particularly regarding the handling of limits and the implications for convergence. There are references to potential computational errors and misunderstandings of the ratio test.

MacLaddy1
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Again I find myself at odds with my online class. Somehow, and with two problems in a row, I am finding the reciprocal answer to what Math Lab is telling me.

I would be very appreciative is someone could check my work.

Find the limit of convergence, and the radius.

[math]\sum \frac{k^2x^{2k}}{k!}[/math]

Using the ratio test

[math]\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty}\frac{(k+1)^2x^{2k+2}}{(k+1)k!}*\frac{k!}{k^2x^{2k}}[/math]

That should be an absolute value, but I don't know how to input that...

This should simplify down to,

[math]x^2\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty}\frac{k^2+2k+1}{k^3+k^2}[/math] (with absolute values inputed)

Which should give an interval of convergence of,

[math]0<x^2<0[/math], R=0, [0,0]

My online class is showing R=[math]\infty[/math] ([math]-\infty,\infty[/math])

The last question gave an R=4, and I was showing R=1/4. I am reversing this somehow. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,
Mac
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Now this is getting weird. I'm definitely doing something funny.

This is the very next question

[math]\sum \frac{x^{2k-1}}{10^{k-1}}[/math]

I am getting an interval of convergence of

[math](-\sqrt{\frac{1}{10}},\sqrt{\frac{1}{10}})[/math]

And the answer it is showing is

[math](-\sqrt{10},\sqrt{10})[/math]
 
MacLaddy said:
Now this is getting weird. I'm definitely doing something funny.

This is the very next question

[math]\sum \frac{x^{2k-1}}{10^{k-1}}[/math]

I am getting an interval of convergence of

[math](-\sqrt{\frac{1}{10}},\sqrt{\frac{1}{10}})[/math]

And the answer it is showing is

[math](-\sqrt{10},\sqrt{10})[/math]

Hi there. (Wave)

Ok, so let's try the Ratio Test.

[math]\left( \frac{x^{2(k+1)-1}}{10^{(k+1)-1}} \right) \left( \frac{10^{k-1}}{x^{2k-1}} \right) = \left( \frac{x^{2k}x^1}{10^{k}} \right) \left( \frac{10^{k}10^{-1}}{x^{2k}x^{-1}} \right) [/math]

After a bunch of cancelling you get [math]\frac{x10^{-1}}{x^{-1}}=\frac{x^2}{10}[/math]

Now you need to find when [math] \left| \frac{x^2}{10} \right| < 1 [/math]

That's just [math]|x^2| < 10[/math] which gives the answer your book has. I checked my work a couple times for computational errors and don't believe I have any, but it's possible.
 
MacLaddy said:
Hello all,

Again I find myself at odds with my online class. Somehow, and with two problems in a row, I am finding the reciprocal answer to what Math Lab is telling me.

I would be very appreciative is someone could check my work.

Find the limit of convergence, and the radius.

[math]\sum \frac{k^2x^{2k}}{k!}[/math]

Using the ratio test

[math]\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty}\frac{(k+1)^2x^{2k+2}}{(k+1)k!}*\frac{k!}{k^2x^{2k}}[/math]

That should be an absolute value, but I don't know how to input that...

This should simplify down to,

[math]x^2\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty}\left| \frac{k^2+2k+1}{k^3+k^2} \right|[/math] ... (CB1)

Which should give an interval of convergence of,

[math]0<x^2<0[/math], R=0, [0,0]

My online class is showing R=[math]\infty[/math] ([math]-\infty,\infty[/math])

You can show that your series is convergent for all \(x\) by comparing it to a suitably modified version of the exponential series which does have an infinite radius of convergence.

You will also get this result if you use (CB1) and do the algebra correctly

CB
 
Last edited:
Jameson said:
Hi there. (Wave)

Ok, so let's try the Ratio Test.

[math]\left( \frac{x^{2(k+1)-1}}{10^{(k+1)-1}} \right) \left( \frac{10^{k-1}}{x^{2k-1}} \right) = \left( \frac{x^{2k}x^1}{10^{k}} \right) \left( \frac{10^{k}10^{-1}}{x^{2k}x^{-1}} \right) [/math]

After a bunch of cancelling you get [math]\frac{x10^{-1}}{x^{-1}}=\frac{x^2}{10}[/math]

Now you need to find when [math] \left| \frac{x^2}{10} \right| < 1 [/math]

That's just [math]|x^2| < 10[/math] which gives the answer your book has. I checked my work a couple times for computational errors and don't believe I have any, but it's possible.

Ahh, that's a bit of a palm to forehead moment.

For some reason I was separating the $x^2$ out, so that I was working with [math]-\frac{1}{10}<x^2<\frac{1}{10}[/math]. That makes a lot more sense now. I can't explain why I was thinking that.

CaptainBlack said:
You can show that your series is convergent for all \(x\) by comparing it to a suitably modified version of the exponential series which does have an infinite radius of convergence.

You will also get this result if you use (CB1) and do the algebra correctly

CB

Still not sure I understand this one. If I take the limit of what's on the right, it becomes zero. At least I thought it did. So if I multiply $x^2$ by 0 I will just end up with [math]-1<0<1[/math]. I'm definitely missing a step here. I see my mistake from the other two problems, but I can't quite rectify it with this one. I'll probably figure it out soon, hopefully, since I saw my mistake from the other ones.

Thanks again, it is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
MacLaddy said:
Still not sure I understand this one. If I take the limit of what's on the right, it becomes zero. At least I thought it did. So if I multiply $x^2$ by 0 I will just end up with [math]-1<0<1[/math]. I'm definitely missing a step here. I see my mistake from the other two problems, but I can't quite rectify it with this one. I'll probably figure it out soon, hopefully, since I saw my mistake from the other ones.

Thanks again, it is much appreciated.

When you take the limit and get 0 regardless of x then the radius of convergence is infinity because it just doesn't matter what the value of x is, the limit will always be less than 1 so it's always true.
 
I may have seen one way to work this, but I probably am not understanding it in the correct- or proper- terms.

If I were to take the limit shown, and leave $x^2$ in the numerator instead of pulling it out front, then improperly I could say [math]-1<\frac{x^2}{\infty}<1 = -\infty<x^2<\infty[/math]

Is that "sort-of" the right thinking? It at least turns out correctly in this scenario, but I know that would be improper.
 
Jameson said:
When you take the limit and get 0 regardless of x then the radius of convergence is infinity because it just doesn't matter what the value of x is, the limit will always be less than 1 so it's always true.

Well, when you put it simply like that then it makes perfect sense. (Smile)

Thanks again, both of you.
 
MacLaddy said:
Still not sure I understand this one. If I take the limit of what's on the right, it becomes zero. At least I thought it did. So if I multiply $x^2$ by 0 I will just end up with [math]-1<0<1[/math]. I'm definitely missing a step here. I see my mistake from the other two problems, but I can't quite rectify it with this one. I'll probably figure it out soon, hopefully, since I saw my mistake from the other ones.

Thanks again, it is much appreciated.

[math]|x^2|\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty}\left| \frac{k^2+2k+1}{k^3+k^2} \right|[/math] ... (CB1)

\[|x^2|\left| \frac{k^2+2k+1}{k^3+k^2} \right|=\left|\frac{x^2(k+1)}{k^2}\right|\]

Now for fixed \(x\) this goes to zeros as \(k \to \infty\) which is less than 1 so the series converges for all \(x\)

CB
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K