Where am I going wrong with this vector addition?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on vector addition in the context of forces from electric charges, specifically addressing the calculation of F13 and F23. The user calculated F13 as -1.35*10^-3 j and F23's j component as 9.67*10^-4 J, leading to a total of -3.84*10^-4. However, the book states the result should be positive 3.84*10^-4, indicating a potential error in the user's interpretation or the book's answer. The user suggests that the negative sign in the i coefficient may have been incorrectly placed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition in physics
  • Familiarity with electric force calculations
  • Knowledge of Cartesian coordinate systems
  • Basic proficiency in handling scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review vector addition principles in physics
  • Study the concept of electric forces and their vector representations
  • Learn about common pitfalls in vector calculations
  • Examine examples of vector addition in textbooks or online resources
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, and anyone needing clarification on vector addition in force calculations.

guyvsdcsniper
Messages
264
Reaction score
37
Homework Statement
Three charged particles with q1 = -50 nC, q2 = +50 nC, and q3 = +30 nC are placed on the corners of the 5.0 cm X 10.0 cm rectangle shown in Figure 22.18lkl. What is the net force on charge q3 due to the other two charges? Give your answer both in component form and as a
magnitude and direction
Relevant Equations
F=kq1q2/r^2
I am following along with an example in my book regarding force from an electric charge. I understand the process but I believe I am getting something wrong when it comes to adding the vectors.

Essentially, F13 is equal to -1.35*10^-3 j and when I add that to the j component of F23 which is 9.67*10^-4 J I am getting -3.84*10^-4. The book is giving positive 3.84*10^-4. I have highlighted the values in the PDF attached. Could someone help me understand why it would be positive?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Clearly a typo in the given answer.
Maybe the minus sign on the i coefficient was supposed to be outside the parentheses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K