Where are you on the political compass?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lyuokdea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants sharing their results from a political compass test, which measures economic and libertarian/authoritarian views. The conversation includes personal interpretations of the scores, reflections on political identities, and varying opinions on the nature of political correctness and ideology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants share their political compass scores, indicating their positions on the economic and libertarian/authoritarian axes.
  • One participant humorously claims victory in the test results, while another emphasizes that there are no right answers in a political test.
  • Several participants express confusion or curiosity about what their scores mean in terms of political identity.
  • There are discussions about the implications of identifying as a Republican or libertarian, with some arguing that true libertarians should accept diverse political views.
  • Some participants reflect on the perceived contradictions in political beliefs, such as being a Republican who supports both pro-choice and gun control policies.
  • Concerns are raised about the test's questions being leading or biased, with some participants suggesting that this might affect the results.
  • One participant expresses surprise at their score, feeling it does not align with their self-perception of political beliefs.
  • Another participant humorously questions how historical figures like Gandhi and Hitler would respond to the test, suggesting skepticism about the test's validity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share their scores and interpretations, but there is no consensus on the implications of these scores or the nature of political identity. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of political beliefs and the validity of the test.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention issues with the test's questions, suggesting they may be leading or poorly constructed, which could influence the results. There is also a recognition that personal beliefs may not align neatly with the test's categories.

  • #31
Economic : 0.0
Lib/Auth : 1.59

Strange. That puts me right in moderate territory.

It must be skewed. I usually consider myself a "Right-Libertarian".


I have to wonder though how they were able to get Ghandi, Hitler, Stalin, et. al. to answer all those questions. Pretty neat trick, that is.

Im sure that if many of those people could actually answer those questions, the people who made the test would be pretty surprised at the results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Economic Left/Right: -3.62
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00


I'm suprised. I was expecting to be closer to 0 on the economic scale, and further negative on the other. I think the test (or at least the way I interpreted it) is slanted towards individual ideals rather than political viewpoints. Though I am not a materialistic person, I strongly believe in capitalism. If you ask my personal preferences, I might sound like a socialist, but if you ask about my economic philosophy, I'll sound more like a capitalist.

Njorl
 
  • #33
Economic Left/Right: -3.25
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56

By the looks of it I'm like ghandi and chretien
 
  • #34
economic:-3.75
liberatarian\authuratarian:-4.46

gandhi-mandela terretory.this was expected. however if every one is in the 3rd quad. how come most political leaders today are in the first?any ideas?got similar on line assessment tests on other things. just love to give them.
 
  • #35
Economic Left/Right: -4.62
Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

I am surprised that scored so left - I find myself disagreeing with many leftists over actually policy. This puts me in "Green Party" territory, a party I don't particulary like.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
The only one I see in that quadrant is Friedman who I know little about.

You are not nearly as economically right as Friedman. Friedman = a less irrationally idiotic Ayn Rand, though still idiotic. Friedman, from what I hear, gets little respect in academia (Ayn Rand just gets mocked or ignored), even in economics where he won the Nobel Prize (many people wonder how the hell he got it, even conservatives - econmic libertarians in general are seen as fools who neither have the capacity nor the will to actually learn how markets work in reality).


edit -Whoa! Friedman (the intellectual father of trickel down economics) now admits he was wrong! Well, at least in the actual real-world use of his famous position by England... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,982271,00.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
14K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
10K
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K